« The VA's Spin | Main | Blogospheric Venom »

May 11, 2007

Does Experience Matter?

Joe Klein writes:

There have been six elections in which control of the presidency has switched parties during the television age. In five of those six, starting with John F. Kennedy's victory over Richard Nixon in 1960, the less experienced candidate won. The other four were: Jimmy Carter over Gerald Ford in 1976, Ronald Reagan over Carter in 1980, Bill Clinton over Bush the Elder in 1992, Bush the Younger over Al Gore in 2000. The one exception to the rule was a toss-up: Nixon and Hubert Humphrey had similar levels of experience in 1968.

I'm not a huge believer in historical precedent, but that's fairly interesting. The problem, at least as I see it, is that all those candidates save George W. Bush were running against incumbents. And Bush was running against an eight-year vice-president. And he lost the vote. So the question of how important experience is when Americans want change versus how important experience is when they're tired of a particular administration remains fairly open.

May 11, 2007 | Permalink

Comments

JFK-Nixon and Nixon-Humphrey were similar to Bush-Gore: the losers were sitting Vice Presidents. Just a quibble.

Posted by: Dix Hill | May 11, 2007 1:58:25 PM

The party in power almost always nominates its sitting president for a second term or its sitting vice president for a first. They are by definition the most experienced candidates, and if we're only looking at elections in which power changed hands, of course the less experienced candidate won. It's tautological.

This analysis is about as interesting as the observation that if you go out in the rain without an umbrella, you will probably get wet. Klein gets paid for this?

Posted by: Mike B. | May 11, 2007 2:12:36 PM

I think people reach a point where they mentally find a answer to the question of whether a candidate has the total background to be a good President; experience is just one of those factors. Some other factors, like those below may influence that judgement on competence, but the result of them is a basic 'yeah, they could do the job' attitude.

Once past that hurdle, then other things become more important in choosing between the two final candidates:
- do they like one more than another
- do they favor the positions of one
- are they happy or angry about the current situation (favoring change more than stability or vice versa)
- has one candidate gotten them excited
- party loyalty and idealogical preferences
- feelings of one person having momentum, globally and within their circle of acqaintances.

I think Klein is mostly right: experience, as a resume thing, is not terribly important. It all depends on the current situation and candidates.

Posted by: JimPortlandOR | May 11, 2007 2:16:43 PM

God, I hate these kinds of arguments. Historical precedents are always broken; the sample set is way too small; you can always cherry-pick a single trait from the winners/losers of the last handful of elections and then make an amazing, sweeping claim as to how that trait is critical/fatal to a campaign. All other things being equal, why would Americans favor a candidate with less experience? When you look at why Clinton beat Bush I, why Carter beat Ford, why Reagan beat Carter, etc., the reasons have far more to do with the state of the country at the time, the personalities of the candidates and the campaigns they ran, not with a bias against experience.

Now, if this is an argument that "experience doesn't matter" - and god knows there are more and more versions of that faux-contrarian line being pushed every day at a time when the top contenders in both parties include two one-term senators, a mayor, a one-term governor and a first lady - then I'll just clear my throat and note that the country is in the middle of two failing foreign wars while its current leadership periodically ponders the possibility of a third, and that the next president is going to be expected to get us out of Iraq and "fix" Afghanistan somehow. The usual response by the "experience doesn't matter" crowd is that a good manager with good instincts can rely on smart advice from smart people without having much in the way of experience him- or herself. The obvious rebuttal to this is that this was precisely the argument made by the Bush camp in 2000.

Posted by: Christmas | May 11, 2007 2:37:22 PM

I think that "experience" is sort of a threshold condition that has to be met, but once it is, it becomes irrelevant. It seems like you have to have some base-level of experience to be taken seriously, but any additional experience beyond that doesn't give you any additional advantage (and can even hurt you).

This usually means at least one term as a Senator or governor. Prototypical examples: GWB, Edwards. There will be some grumbling about inexperience, but it probably won't really matter. Obama is pushing the outer limits of this category.

The sweet spot is about a decade in one of those positions - Reagan, Kennedy, Clinton. Giuliani.

Anything more than that, I think, is a drawback - Kerry, Gephardt, Dole - unless you've been the VP (Gore, GHWB) in which case you're not really running on your own resume anyway.

That's all assuming we can really draw any conclusions from history in this regard, which is questionable.

Posted by: Jason | May 11, 2007 3:05:34 PM

Mike B. and Christmas are right. Klein might as well say that the Washington Redskins can predict the election. Five out of six by a half-tautological definition, in a half-arbitrary timeframe? What do I have to do to get paid for this kind of insight?

Posted by: Cyrus | May 11, 2007 3:14:21 PM

I read an article -- way back when Nixon was running against Kennedy with the slogan "Experience Counts" -- that pointed out that the more able rise to the top the fastest -- that is, with less experience. Lincoln was one example.

Posted by: Denis Drew | May 11, 2007 4:35:49 PM

If you don't buy the tautological argument:
By my count more experienced candidates won 6/6 times when party control continued. Overall 11/12 times the controlling party managed to present the electorate with a more experienced candidate.

Posted by: ChrisB | May 11, 2007 4:53:00 PM

the more able rise to the top the fastest -- that is, with less experience. Lincoln was one example.

Interesting idea.

Posted by: Sanpete | May 11, 2007 5:04:08 PM

The point regarding both Hillary, Edwards and Obama is that they don´t have less experience, but that´s they have none. I don´t remember any candidate in the post-WWII that get the nomination with such lack of experience.

Kennedy almost lost, and he had TWO US Senate mandates and more than ten years in the House.

Posted by: André Kenji | May 12, 2007 1:16:14 AM

You are much to kind to the other Klein. You have proven that his empirical result is almost perfectly tautological as incumbency of one's party and experience are almost perfectly correlated (perfectly correlated if one claims that 5 = 8 as he does in the case of Nixon and Humphrey). Thus, since 1960, we have known before election day that a switch of party would logically imply the election of the less experienced candidate. The observation that, surprise surprise, after election day, it became clear that when there was a switch of party the less experienced candidate won adds nothing to our knowledge whatsoever. Joeseph Klein has presented an un-falsifiable hypothesis and drawn conclusions from the failure of the data to refute it. He demonstrates only that he is an idiot, but we already knew that didn't we ?

Posted by: Robert Waldmann | May 12, 2007 6:34:35 AM

That experience might be a disadvantage in this and some other elections (Joe K's actual claim), or that experience doesn't matter (a claim he doesn't make), isn't tautological or unfalsifiable.

Posted by: Sanpete | May 12, 2007 12:54:17 PM

liqingchao 07年08月30日
google排名
google排名
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
power leveling
power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power level
wow power level
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling
Crm
Crm
呼叫中心
呼叫中心
客户关系管理
客户关系管理
北京月嫂
北京月嫂
china tour
china tour
hongkong hotel
hongkong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour

北京律师
北京律师
礼品
礼品
礼品公司
礼品公司
会议礼品
会议礼品
商务礼品
商务礼品
保洁
保洁
保洁公司
保洁公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
鼓风机
风机
风机
货架
光盘刻录
光盘刻录
光盘制作
光盘制作
光盘印刷
光盘印刷
红外测温仪
红外测温仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波测厚仪

超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
频闪仪
频闪仪
涂层测厚仪
涂层测厚仪
电火花检测仪
电火花检测仪
google排名
集团电话
集团电话
网站设计
网站设计
多媒体
监控
监控
搬家公司
搬家公司
条码打印机
条码打印机

Posted by: wslmwps | Aug 30, 2007 1:35:32 AM

maple story
maple story mesos
maple story cheats
maple story meso
maple story hacks
maple story items
maple story guides
cheap maple story
buy maple story mesos

rf online
rf online cp
rf online currency
rf online dalant
rf online disena
buy rf online currency
buy rf online cp
buy rf online dalant

Posted by: maple story | Sep 11, 2007 4:32:45 AM

EVE ISK
EQ2 Gold
FFXI Gil
Guild Wars Gold
Lineage 2 Adena
Runescape Money
wow power leveling
wow gold
cheap wow gold
World of Warcraft Gold
wow power leveling
EVE ISK
EQ2 Gold
EQ2 plat
everquest 2 gold
FFXI Gil
FFXI Gil
Guild Wars Gold
Lineage 2 Adena
Maple Story Mesos
Runescape Money
Runescape Gold
runescape items
SilkRoad Gold
wow gold
warcraft gold
cheap wow gold
wow gold
warcraft gold
LOTRO Gold
wow power leveling
cheap wow gold
wow gold
cheap wow gold
wow gold
runescape gold
runescape money
runescape items
cheap runescape money
cheap runescape gold
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
ffxi gil
guild wars gold
eve isk
Final Fantasy XI Gil
ro Zeny
wow gold
cheap wow gold
cheap wow gold
eq2 gold
eq2 plat
everquest 2 gold
lotro gold
lotro power leveling
lotro powerleveling

Posted by: azavin | Sep 19, 2007 8:44:05 PM

托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
钢托盘
木托盘
钢制托盘
托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
杭州托盘
成都托盘
武汉托盘
长沙托盘
合肥托盘
苏州托盘
无锡托盘
昆山托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
南京钢制托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘

托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
木托盘
塑料托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘


托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
托盘
塑料托盘

Posted by: judy | Oct 8, 2007 6:07:02 AM

prevacid 30mg buy genric prevacid 300mg online
buy prilosec buy generic prilosec online
herbal medication buy herbal medication online
hypertension medication buy hypertension medication online
diovan 80 mg buy generic diovan online
Generic Lotensin buy generic lotensin online
mens health products buy mens health products online
Aciphex Online Aciphex Online

Posted by: lisa | Oct 23, 2007 4:07:16 AM

空调维修
办公室装修
三洋电视机维修
杭州装饰公司 http://www.0571ax.com
杭州中央空调销售
补漏公司
油烟机清洗
空调拆装
开锁公司
杭州空调维修 http://www.hzw1.com
杭州家政服务 http://www.hzmq.net
地毯清洗
华宝热水器维修
海信电视机维修
海尔空调维修中心

Posted by: 新房装修设计 | Nov 26, 2007 9:36:22 PM

Ultram pain relief drug (Tramadol) is used to relieve moderate to moderately severe pain. It also may be used to treat pain caused by surgery and chronic conditions such as cancer or joint pain. This medication is sometimes prescribed for other uses; ask your doctor or pharmacist for more information. Order tramadol ultram online

Butalbital pain relief medication is a pain reliever and sedative. It is used to relieve mild to moderate pain and tension headaches. Order generic fioricet butalbital online

Combination medicines containing opioid analgesics (nar-KOT-ik an-al-JEE-zicks ) such as tramadol (TRA-ma-dole) and acetaminophen (a-seat-a-MIN-oh-fen ) are used to relieve pain. An opioid analgesic and acetaminophen used together may provide better pain relief than either medicine used alone. In some cases, you may get relief with lower doses of each medicine. Order Ultracet online

Fioricet pain relief drug is the combination of acetaminophen, butalbital, and caffeine is used to relieve tension headaches. Order generic fioricet online

Wellbutrin antidepressant drug (Bupropion) is used to treat depression. Bupropion is used to help people stop smoking. This medication is sometimes prescribed for other uses; ask your doctor or pharmacist for more information. Order generic wellbutrin bupropion online

Diflucan Flucanazole medication is an antifungal agent used to treat infections in certain areas of the body caused by yeast and yeast-like organisms. Generic Diflucan works best when the amount of medicine in your body is kept at a constant level. Do this by taking the medication at evenly spaced intervals. Take as directed since different conditions require different methods of use. This drug is usually taken once daily. Another dosing method involves taking the drug for one week per month until treatment is completed. Continue to take this medication until the full prescribed amount is finished even if symptoms disappear after a few days. Stopping the medication too early may allow the yeast to continue to grow resulting in a relapse of the infection. Order generic diflucan online

More top drug stores:

Posted by: Tim | Dec 4, 2007 6:32:26 PM

Abortion should be, should not be kept legal

Posted by: pink visual dvds | Jan 1, 2008 3:07:50 AM

I haven't been up to much these days. Such is life. I've just been letting everything happen without me these days, but I don't care.

Posted by: backseatbangers jenevieve | Jan 4, 2008 9:34:58 PM

Parents have no right in spanking you - Or do they? That could be another persuasive speech topic

Posted by: older nude model | Jan 7, 2008 2:24:00 AM

Blame the parents of a murderer parents for the crime

Posted by: gay movieaccess | Jan 7, 2008 8:42:30 PM

I can't be bothered with anything recently. I've pretty much been doing nothing to speak of. Not that it matters.

Posted by: cheer chix | Jan 27, 2008 9:58:55 AM

Cigarette ads do influence, don't influence starting to smoke

Posted by: bathroom voyeurism | Feb 3, 2008 2:17:56 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.