« Targets | Main | I Have A Dream »
October 16, 2007
In Praise of Slumber
New York Magazine has a terrifically interesting article on sleep research, and the overwhelming scientific consensus that even moderate reductions in shut-eye can do serious damage to our mental speed. In one study, "the University of Pennsylvania’s David Dinges did an experiment shortening adults’ sleep to six hours a night. After two weeks, they reported they were doing okay. Yet on a battery of tests, they proved to be just as impaired as someone who has stayed awake for 24 hours straight." Yikes. In another, we learn that "Sleep deprivation hits the hippocampus harder than the amygdala. The result is that sleep-deprived people fail to recall pleasant memories yet recall gloomy memories just fine. In one experiment...sleep-deprived college students tried to memorize a list of words. They could remember 81 percent of the words with a negative connotation, like cancer. But they could remember only 41 percent of the words with a positive or neutral connotation, like sunshine or basket."
We also get some data on the commonly heard, and totally accurate, complaint that schools start too early. "in Edina, Minnesota, an affluent suburb of Minneapolis...the high school start time was changed from 7:25 a.m. to 8:30. The results were startling. In the year preceding the time change, math and verbal SAT scores for the top 10 percent of Edina’s students averaged 1288. A year later, the top 10 percent averaged 1500, an increase that couldn’t be attributed to any other variable." And yes, as anyone who's ever stayed up all night and felt voraciously hungry in the morning knows, sleep deprivation stimulates your appetite, and makes you fat. "Three foreign studies showed strikingly similar results. One analyzed Japanese elementary students, one Canadian kindergarten boys, and one young boys in Australia. They all showed that kids who get less than eight hours of sleep have about a 300 percent higher rate of obesity than those who get a full ten hours of sleep....In Houston public schools, according to a University of Texas at Houston study, adolescents’ odds of obesity went up 80 percent for each hour of lost sleep. "
The risk of reading this article is that you'll do what I did this morning, which is wake up tired, tell yourself that your place of employment wouldn't want you functioning at 60% capacity, nor becoming really fat, and go back to sleep. A little sleep research is a dangerous thing, particularly at 7 in the morning.
October 16, 2007 in Health and Medicine | Permalink
Comments
Then again...here in China, the typical high school student sleeps five to six hours per night, and they seem to do just fine. Then again, my own experience would corroborate the results of the study.
Posted by: Matt Schiavenza | Oct 16, 2007 9:54:21 AM
"words with a positive or neutral connotation, like sunshine or basket"
where do they get these researchers?
the word 'basket' is terrifying!
it fills me with a nameless dread, and the sense that all human life is pointless suffering.
torture basket!!
agony basket!!!
basket...of DOOOOM!!!
Posted by: kid bitzer | Oct 16, 2007 9:58:33 AM
that aside, though--yeah, you have to get enough sleep.
people fool themselves about their cognitive functioning--that's probably the most useful finding of the studies mentioned.
we're used to this fact with alcohol impairment--nobody any longer gives credence to drunks who claims that they drive just fine when they're drunk.
but we haven't yet got used to discounting people's reports of their brilliant success at getting by with too little sleep.
Posted by: kid bitzer | Oct 16, 2007 10:01:04 AM
Early-a.m. insomniac here. If I could figure out a way to roll over and get that extra hour's sleep in the morning, I'd be doing it already.
Apparently my body thinks I ought to be waking up at 4:30 in the morning. Dammitall.
Posted by: low-tech cyclist | Oct 16, 2007 10:18:12 AM
Kid, don't forget the handbasket that we're all in. I'm a basket case.
Posted by: KCinDC | Oct 16, 2007 10:28:38 AM
kc--
lay off already, will you? you're giving me the jitters.
look--it's just a sinister word, filled with evil connotations, and i don't think it should be heard in polite society.
think of the children.
Posted by: kid bitzer | Oct 16, 2007 10:33:23 AM
Best scholastic advice that my father ever gave me was to get three full nights sleep before an exam. It takes that to get information to go from short term storage to long term storage. He also advised me to not sleep at all if I felt that I had to cram for an exam. The moment that you nod off the process starts and most of what you just crammed becomes accessible only in small pieces. I was a surprisingly well-rested student.
Posted by: Hawise | Oct 16, 2007 10:44:27 AM
When do high schools actually start these days? Is 7:25 normal? If so, why? I think that's nuts.
Posted by: David in NY | Oct 16, 2007 10:52:18 AM
When do high schools actually start these days? Is 7:25 normal? If so, why? I think that's nuts.
A lot of the "why" is due to transportation issues - towns that use buses have to schedule school so the same buses can pick up and drop off kids that go to high school, middle school, and elementary school.
I live in a fully suburban town (think: small city), and 90% of the kids are designated as "walkers" (although most of them end up getting rides from parents), but since the town has to provide buses for the 10% that live too far away or have an unsafe walking environment, so they have to stagger school starts and ends.
Posted by: maurinsky | Oct 16, 2007 11:16:25 AM
Yes, bus schedules and also parental schedules and teacher schedules create this emphasis on earliness. If you have to get your kid off to school before *you* start your hour long trek in to work and *your* work schedule is starting earlier and earlier there is a strong incentive to allow the schools to push their own start time back.
I would be totally in favor of having schools start later for academic reasons but I am in a luxury position--I could still see my kids off to school, or drive them, even if school began at 9:00 (it begins at 8:30 here but my young children could easily sleep until 7:30 or 8.
aimai
Posted by: aimai | Oct 16, 2007 11:53:15 AM
aimai...
i think you are absolutely right.
chldren need more sleep...and i think, less school.
i think school is highly overrated for children.
....when my children were little, we practiced lots of "mental health days".
whenever they woke up and didnt want to go to school, it was simple...they got to stay home.
we were not favorites at the attendance office, but those days were times of peace and coziness for them.
...i look back and feel that the surprise days when they got to cuddle up under their blankets reading books about dragons or making collages at home were wonderful and surreptitiously happy days for all of us.
and it made them more relaxed and freespirited.
....and yes, to more sleep and rest for grown-ups.
health, judgement and passion for life can be wrecked and all but permanently impaired by lack of sleep.
...everyone, go back to bed...under the covers with cups of hot chocolate and favorite books! no work today!
Posted by: jacqueline | Oct 16, 2007 12:57:39 PM
a little qualifier...
when raising my two younger children, though i worked very hard,i had a flexible schedule where i could often work at home.
i know that was a lucky luxury, and i was most grateful for it.
Posted by: jacqueline | Oct 16, 2007 1:01:27 PM
Isn't anyone suspicious (in a skepticism sense, not malfeasance) about this sudden jump in SATs from an average of 1288 to 1500? I know that it's supposed to be "ceteris paribus", but that's just unreal.
Posted by: Klug | Oct 16, 2007 3:45:11 PM
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
钢托盘
木托盘
钢制托盘
托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
杭州托盘
成都托盘
武汉托盘
长沙托盘
合肥托盘
苏州托盘
无锡托盘
昆山托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
南京钢制托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
木托盘
塑料托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
Posted by: peterwei | Oct 21, 2007 11:35:35 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.