« Trade Prorities | Main | Quote of the Day »
May 14, 2007
"Reporting" and Credentialism
Sigh. I really need to get away from all this media navelgazing, but this is a very smart post by Kagro X on the constraints facing traditional journalists. There is a decidedly odd absence of self-consciousness on the part of many journalists about the limitations of their profession's approach to information gathering, and the way in which they really can be bested by both experts and amateurs engaged in sustained study of an issue. But that's to be a bit too kind: It's half a lack of self-consciousness, and half a projected arrogance born of status anxiety.
When Brian Williams says that "[a]ll of my life, developing credentials to cover my field of work" -- and what field of work would that be, by the way? -- "and now I'm up against a guy named Vinny in an efficiency apartment in the Bronx who hasn't left the efficiency apartment in two years," what he's saying isn't that his years as a reporter better equip him to cover traffic patterns than a guy who's spent years in a cramped space studying urban planning. He's a generalist whose reputation for "reporting" gives him the credibility to range widely over subjects he can't possibly have studied in-depth. He's saying that those credentials make him better than some nobody in a basement somewhere. But if someone else has better credentials -- a tenured professorship, say, or published books to his name -- the quiet study approach is perfectly accepted by mainstream journalists. For instance: The punditocracy has enormous respect for Paul Berman, who looms large in George Packer's history of the Iraq War, The Assassin's Gate. Packer admiringly describes Berman's spartan, life-of-the-mind existence: “Berman lived alone in a walk-up apartment that was strewn with back issues of the Anarcho-Syndicalist Review and volumes of French literature and philosophy in the original,” and writes that, "I listened, occasionally asking a skeptical question, admiring the dedication of his project (who else was really trying to figure this stuff out?)."
Brian Williams, of course, would never demean Berman as "some guy named Paul who lives by himself in a walk-up and hasn't shaved in three months." Berman is credentialed and respected. And that's what separates him from Vinny, and protects him from the same dismissal. Reporting has a talismanic quality in this town, to be sure, and for good reason: There's no substitute for real reporting. But too often, picking up the phone and calling three people does not magically grant omniscience, and nor does studying issues in a half-hearted and generalist way. Too often, reporting is really just a word that paid writers use to separate themselves from the unwashed, typing masses. Indeed, it's telling that Sy Hersch is usually upset about the lack of reporting among self-described reporters, rather than among bloggers.
May 14, 2007 in Gaze at my Navel! | Permalink
Comments
A smart reporter calls Vinny for information on the topic.
Williams resents the fact that bullshit isn't walking as it used to.
Posted by: Mudge | May 14, 2007 2:04:29 PM
Okay, the Gaze at my Navel tag is funny.
Posted by: Nicholas Beaudrot | May 14, 2007 2:19:25 PM
yup. I.F. Stone did real reporting, his whole life, and was never accepted as a media insider.
There's a lot of irrationality and crap in who gets respect from the MSM and who don't.
Still--at some point, Ezra, it may occur to you that it would be nicer not to have to buck the current on these issues. Sure, the bouncers at the dance club are arbitrary jerks. But why go there wearing jeans if you know they have a no-jeans policy?
My advice? Kill two birds with one stone: get some credentials that actually teach you some stuff.
Why the *hell* aren't you enrolled at a good Policy or Government school, getting an MA in Health Care Policy? Do you think you're going to do a *worse* job of covering the issues if you have spent a year or two at the Kennedy School or Woodrow Wilson or whatever and had the chance to look deeper into the issues, and acquire some more analytical tools?
Then you walk out in a year or two, you've got an unimpeachable credential, and you can *still* kick the reporters' asses by doing genuine reporting. And blog to your heart's content.
Posted by: granddad | May 14, 2007 2:20:17 PM
your final comment is the most critical one: we see very little "reporting" in today's media (who knows, maybe we never did). we see a lot of repetition of storylines, a lot of "he said/she said," a lot of poor judgement, but very little actual in-depth reporting.
and certainly none of it from brian williams, the very same guy who posed a question to senator clinton based on a "letter to usa today" that said that general patton would "stomp" harry reid:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/5/12/223234/735
presumably, williams knew from his crack reporting that the letter writer didn't live in an efficiency apartment in the bronx and had left his or her home some time in the past two years.
or something.
Posted by: howard | May 14, 2007 2:25:26 PM
Vinny essentially sounds like a laugh by the folks who killed D Enchautegui. One real problem though is that Williams is not up against that guy any more than the people who are actually housebounhd in his neighborhood subirradiated. And the other is that basically when a man like Brian Williams takes on the notion that he is the government it becomes laughable for anyone to disagree with him and a part of the rose pile which explains to us that disagreeing with Golan Cipel makes you a SCIRI.
Posted by: dot net | May 14, 2007 2:37:27 PM
what you describe is the way of any business. I suppose the problem is you may see news reporting as not being a business.
Posted by: akaison | May 14, 2007 3:05:18 PM
Granddad: The notion that getting academic certification will yield automatic respect from journalists simply isn't true. A significant percentage of top bloggers are PhDs, JDs, or graduates of top master's programs. We're still lumped in with Vinny by the likes of Williams.
Posted by: James Joyner | May 14, 2007 3:09:55 PM
Maybe we should be blaming Cronkhite, David Brinkley, Chet Huntley et al (early TV news anchors) for the apparent fixation on a 'famous face' to lend credibility to the news. So now we have Williams and Katie Couric. All the money spent is on the presenter and less and less on the actual reporting. We forget that what made CBS and NBC credible was in-depth teams strung around the world who took time and effort to learn the areas they reported on. And Murrow, steeped in old journalism and fearless in reporting facts and backing opinions with reality.
The Brits did it differently with BBC: they had 'newsreaders' for anchors, and relied upon the reporting in the field. And it still is way way better than anything we have in the US.
So now we have Chris Mathews, Stephanopolis and others who are just faces with opinions, pretending to be journalists. Well, I have a face and an opinion too (LOL).
The failures of our major media are more than hubris, they come from seeing news as an entertainment biz that can make lots of money if they don't do much actual reporting and investigative journalism.
And then there is news as propaganda, like Fox, some of AP, some of CNN, some of NBC, etc. Political cant disguised as reporting. They couldn't do much better if they were directly paid by the Republican party or Putin's party in Moscow.
At least in the 'new' Russia, the people understand that all the major media are government owned or controlled, so little is expected and little delivered in the way of real, free, factual, you know, NEWS.
Does it make any difference if NBC is controlled by GE or by the government? Not really.
The old phrase from the early days of computing works here: garbage in, garbage out. We are so deep into not-attributible insider spin and press release journalism that we think the garbage is a meal.
Posted by: JimPortlandOR | May 14, 2007 3:14:23 PM
Not to take a cheap shot...oh what the hell -- aren't the main qualifications for Brian William's job the ability to have nice teeth and hair, the illusion of gravitas, and a nice, clear speaking voice? We've all seen Broadcast News, who's kidding who here?
I don't see how credentialing is an online problem. Online, Vinny is just Vinny, or blackcat666, or whatever, and nobody particularly gives added weight to his comments other than the value of the comments themselves. If he says something smart, people will notice. If he's a crank, they'll notice that, too. But nowhere does his identity really factor into the mix because he could be ANYBODY.
Now, if Vinny wants to get Op Eds in the LA Times, or do his own reporting, he'll probably have to identify himself, as virtually all major bloggers have done. But media types seem really bothered that Vinny can spout off his opinions, and worse, spout his opinions to their email accounts, and worst of all, possibly be right.
Meanwhile, it's really the media that props people up and presents them as experts or Very Important Pundits, even when they aren't experts necessarily, even when they're addressing issues outside their field of expertise, and even when they may have vested interests in the comments they're making. Much of the problem with credentials comes precisely when the media tries to tell us which voices we should listen to and which we shouldn't.
Look at Williams. Most of his credentials come from the fact that NBC put him on The News. How many of his viewers know his bio? Now, there's some implicit trust that NBC wouldn't put a complete bozo in that chair, but it's also not true that their main motivation is to put the wisest, most accomplished person on air either. Their goal is to put on the person who will get the most eyeballs looking at Mastercard commercials. Which is why CBS won't blanch when one of their new news employees insists that obviously incorrect leprosy data is right because "We reported it!" After all, ABC has Glenn Beck.
With Vinny, I may not know exactly who I'm getting, but no pretense is made that I'm getting anything other than a Vinny, anyway.
Posted by: Royko | May 15, 2007 2:22:17 AM
At the end of the day, it comes down to the question: Why are people abandoning the traditional news outlets in favor of the specialized or niche outlets (including blogs)? He's just running (talking) scared that his old dog won't hunt.
Posted by: SSG | May 15, 2007 12:32:11 PM
At the end of the day, it comes down to the question: Why are people abandoning the traditional news outlets in favor of the specialized or niche outlets (including blogs)? He's just running (talking) scared that his old dog won't hunt.
Posted by: SSG | May 15, 2007 12:32:13 PM
"credentials" is what Oz gave the Straw Man (sic)
Posted by: william edgar boggan | May 15, 2007 4:12:38 PM
liqingchao 07年08月30日
google排名
google排名
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
power leveling
power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power level
wow power level
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling
Crm
Crm
呼叫中心
呼叫中心
客户关系管理
客户关系管理
北京月嫂
北京月嫂
china tour
china tour
hongkong hotel
hongkong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour
北京律师
北京律师
礼品
礼品
礼品公司
礼品公司
会议礼品
会议礼品
商务礼品
商务礼品
保洁
保洁
保洁公司
保洁公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
鼓风机
风机
风机
货架
光盘刻录
光盘刻录
光盘制作
光盘制作
光盘印刷
光盘印刷
红外测温仪
红外测温仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
频闪仪
频闪仪
涂层测厚仪
涂层测厚仪
电火花检测仪
电火花检测仪
google排名
集团电话
集团电话
网站设计
网站设计
多媒体
监控
监控
搬家公司
搬家公司
条码打印机
条码打印机
Posted by: wslmwps | Aug 30, 2007 1:57:21 AM
EVE ISK
EQ2 Gold
FFXI Gil
Guild Wars Gold
Lineage 2 Adena
Runescape Money
wow power leveling
wow gold
cheap wow gold
World of Warcraft Gold
wow power leveling
EVE ISK
EQ2 Gold
EQ2 plat
everquest 2 gold
FFXI Gil
FFXI Gil
Guild Wars Gold
Lineage 2 Adena
Maple Story Mesos
Runescape Money
Runescape Gold
runescape items
SilkRoad Gold
wow gold
warcraft gold
cheap wow gold
wow gold
warcraft gold
LOTRO Gold
wow power leveling
cheap wow gold
wow gold
cheap wow gold
wow gold
runescape gold
runescape money
runescape items
cheap runescape money
cheap runescape gold
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
ffxi gil
guild wars gold
eve isk
Final Fantasy XI Gil
ro Zeny
wow gold
cheap wow gold
cheap wow gold
eq2 gold
eq2 plat
everquest 2 gold
lotro gold
lotro power leveling
lotro powerleveling
swg credits
swg credits
swg credits
Posted by: azavin | Sep 19, 2007 11:07:04 PM
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
钢托盘
木托盘
钢制托盘
托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
杭州托盘
成都托盘
武汉托盘
长沙托盘
合肥托盘
苏州托盘
无锡托盘
昆山托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
南京钢制托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
木托盘
塑料托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
Posted by: judy | Oct 8, 2007 6:14:52 AM
credit card offer credit card offer
mastercard credit card mastercard credit card
visa credit card visa credit card
amex credit cards amex credit cards
special offers credit cards special offers credit cards
chase credit cards chase credit cards
citibank credit cards citibank credit cards
discover credit cards discover credit cards
Posted by: tom | Oct 23, 2007 3:50:25 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.