« My Honor...Defended! | Main | The Best Idea In The World »

March 17, 2007

Bill Richardson Has A Cramped Writing Hand

by Stephen of the Thinkery

It's because he's been signing bills at a furious pace.  Of interest is the medical marijuana bill that he just signed.  What it does is set up a system whereby patients with a doctor's authorization can receive marijuana from New Mexico's Health Department.  I'm going to assume that this won't be appearing on anyone's formulary, though.

It's a fairly bold move, though obviously less so now that 11 other states have already passed laws similar to this.  But Richardson is apparently the first presidential candidate who has taken concrete steps in favor of legalizing medical marijuana.  What I do like is how he responded to questions about this (from the same article):

Richardson said he has been asked about the issue by only a few voters while campaigning in Iowa. He said the White House had urged him not to sign the bill. "I don't see it as being a big issue," he said. "This is for medicinal purpose, for . . . people that are suffering. My God, let's be reasonable."

He didn't try to cast himself as some sort of hero, nor did he try to clothe himself in Ultimate Political Boldness.  It's just a common-sense thing to do.  "People are suffering" and he had a chance to help them, so he took it.

Moving on to other things Richardson, Heath Haussamen's blog is an excellent stop for all things political in New Mexico.  Here's some of the other bills signed by Richardson in the last few days of the legislative session, taken from Heath's blog:

  • Minimum wage.  It increases NM's wage to $6.50 in January and $7.50 one year later.  It's not perfect; it prevents cities and counties from making their own increases over the state minimum wage, but there's a lot more places relying on the federal minimum than places that have set a minimum over $6.50/hr.
  • Cockfighting ban.  Good grief.  It took New Mexico until 2007 to ban this?  They were yakking about it before I went to college.
  • Ethics bill.  There are several bills working their way through the legislature; one passed both the House and Senate and now awaits signing.  "House Bill 823 .   .   .   .  would require that public officials disclose, in cases of contracts and other business with the state, not only their own business but also that of spouses, children, parents and siblings. It also makes the act apply to judges, who are currently exempt from its provision that prohibits bribery."  I guess I'm not going to become a judge in NM after all.
  • Whistleblower protection.  This is pretty good stuff.  Provides protection to people who expose governmental wrongdoing, including contractors for the state government.

Except for the cockfighting ban, Richardson has been supportive of all these measures during his tenure as governor.  I don't think he's a fan of cockfighting, it's just something that hasn't really been on the radar.  When he started to run for president, quite a few people pointed out that this would be an issue that could hurt him, so he took action.

Unlike the gaggle of Democratic Senators running for president, Richardson's campaign has proven to be a benefit to progressive values in New Mexico.  Like any governor in such a race, Richardson is running on his record and the fact that the people in his state just love him so gosh-darn much.  It's keeping him focused upon what New Mexicans want even as he tries to tailor his image and message to a national audience.

He's clearly the dark horse candidate in this race.  As I recently said at the ThinkeryHe's still a long shot for the nomination, but right now I'd say the list of possible VP picks runs something like this:

  • Bill Richardson
  • Someone else if Bill won't do it

But then I also pointed out that the rumors surrounding his behavior are not going away.  In the National Journal's campaign rankings, they mention the rumors with a double entendre that implies that Richardson's problems are with rumors that he's been unfaithful to his wife.  Before the national press got into it, those rumors hadn't been started yet.  But reporters are lazy, and trying to describe the nuances of certain behaviors, gestures, and vocabulary is hard.  Besides, Richardson is a Latino and a Democrat, so obviously he's sleeping around.

The longer he waits to address this issue directly, the worse it gets.  Now he has to defend himself against not only rumors that he behaves inappropriately, but also a misunderstanding of those rumors that allows his opponents to place him exactly where male Democratic candidates always get placed.  Richardson better wise up, or he won't have a chance to be partially vetted before withdrawing his name this time around.

March 17, 2007 | Permalink

Comments

How much credit should Richardson get for these bills? He gets credit for agreeing with them, of course, but has he pushed for them too?

But reporters are lazy, and trying to describe the nuances of certain behaviors, gestures, and vocabulary is hard. Besides, Richardson is a Latino and a Democrat, so obviously he's sleeping around.

Not fair to reporters. The rumors about infidelity appear to be his own fault, for denying rumors about other things as though they were rumors about infidelity (which may have been an evasive tactic). Then his denials were printed, with their premise implying the till then nonexistent rumors. I don't see any evidence for the Latino/Democrat connection either. Maybe you're joking, but a reporter took that idea seriously enough to ask Richardson about it.

Richardson better wise up, or he won't have a chance to be partially vetted before withdrawing his name this time around.

Ooh! It's true, he needs to face this more directly and completely and soon, if he's serious about running for President. He seems to me to have been suspiciously evasive all along.

Posted by: Sanpete | Mar 17, 2007 3:08:22 AM

To me,the great irony is Richardson is exactly what a president should be. The sad part is that he will probably never have a real chance to allow his experience, his personality, his ability to make those bold decisions ( make no mistake, signing this bill is tantamount to destroying his presidential chances)to really come out amidst all the other BS that will be flying thick and steady in the upcoming year.
Too bad.


Posted by: marcus | Mar 17, 2007 11:47:02 AM

Thank you for this, Stephen. In light of the recent smackdown of medical marijuana (again), it's nice to learn that some politicians are willing to stand up for what should really be a non-issue. I honestly thought that when my peers reached the age where we were not only running for office, but actually dominating the leadership positions in America, marijuana would be recognized for what it is: a substance that can do both good and harm, like so many other products we grow or produce, and consume. A substance that is certainly safer than many legal ones currently available at every grocery store and gas station in the nation; one that, regardless of the law, many Americans choose to use for personal relaxation and recreation; one that has proven palliative and appetite-enhancing effects for the sickest among us.

Quite frankly, I'm amazed that in the years since I emerged from the smoke-filled dorms of UF, here I am, at forty-six, still watching the same tired debate, still seeing so many resources poured into drug law enforcement within a culture that seems hell-bent on doing one thing while preaching another.

All I know is, friends who've undergone chemotherapy tell me that their evening joint was a godsend. Denying adult Americans the right to alleviate crippling nausea and body aches via the use of a relatively benign plant seems like all kinds of wrong to me, and I'm glad to see Richardson, for one, rising above the hypocrisy.

Posted by: litbrit | Mar 17, 2007 1:45:14 PM

I also like Richardson, but I've said it before and I'll say it again: the Dems would have to be psychotic and suicidal to nominate another candidate with a zipper problem. If there's any truth to these rumors at all, he's political poison, and shouldn't be either the pres or VP nominee.

Posted by: beckya57 | Mar 17, 2007 1:46:20 PM

I don't think Richardson as VP is so set in stone. Undoubtedly, I think, he would be qualified - hell, he's probably the most qualified candidate for president - but I think, given his supposed zipper problems, whether real or imagined, the focus might instead be on the governor of Kansas, Kathleen Sebelius. A real progressive governor in a red state, I can see Obama asking her to be VP for fear of putting two minorities on the ticket and after he defeated a woman, it might be seen as magnanimous and appropriate given the nature of the party to nominate a woman.

Clinton would probably be the most likely to ask Richardson. She would have just beaten a minority in Obama, and the national balance coupled with Richardson would be appealing.

Either way, Richardson and Sebelius are clearly the top two VP candidates. We need a little executive experience on the ticket.

Posted by: EggMan | Mar 17, 2007 6:47:57 PM

I'm sure the fact that this one person who was suffering greatly from a medical horror and yet was sentenced to something like 20 years for smoking medical weed (these guys are heartless creatons) had something to do with Richardson's decision. He probably was as horrified as many of us that the courts would do something like that to someone suffering so much.
Bully for him. that took guts.

Posted by: vwcat | Mar 17, 2007 9:41:30 PM

Does anyone here know how this minimum wage bill will effect Santa Fe's much higher minimum wage? Isn't it around $10? It was one of the great success stories for the minimum wage.

Posted by: feral cat | Mar 18, 2007 9:00:54 AM

托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
钢托盘
木托盘
钢制托盘
托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
杭州托盘
成都托盘
武汉托盘
长沙托盘
合肥托盘
苏州托盘
无锡托盘
昆山托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
南京钢制托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘

托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
木托盘
塑料托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘


托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
托盘
塑料托盘

Posted by: judy | Sep 27, 2007 4:07:27 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.