« I'm Just Saying | Main | The CEO President »

January 29, 2007

Cows R Us

CowsMichael Pollan, author, most recently, of the excellent Omnivore's Dilemma, has a long attack on "nutritionism" in the latest NYT Magazine. This bit is particularly on point:

It might be argued that, at this point in history, we should simply accept that fast food is our food culture. Over time, people will get used to eating this way and our health will improve. But for natural selection to help populations adapt to the Western diet, we’d have to be prepared to let those whom it sickens die. That’s not what we’re doing. Rather, we’re turning to the health-care industry to help us “adapt.” Medicine is learning how to keep alive the people whom the Western diet is making sick. It’s gotten good at extending the lives of people with heart disease, and now it’s working on obesity and diabetes. Capitalism is itself marvelously adaptive, able to turn the problems it creates into lucrative business opportunities: diet pills, heart-bypass operations, insulin pumps, bariatric surgery.

There's similar chapter in The Omnivore's Dilemma about our treatment of cows. The short version of this is that we've taken an animal accustomed to feeding on forage and forced it to digest grain. Corn, after all, is cheaper, more plentiful, more engineerable, less land-intensive, and more subsidized than grass. But cows haven't evolved to eat corn. And so we drug 'em.

Bloat is perhaps the most serious thing that can go wrong with a ruminant on corn. The fermentation in the rumen produces copious amounts of gas, which is normally expelled by belching during rumination. But when the diet contains too much starch and too little roughage, rumination all but stops, and a layer of foamy slime forms in the rumen that can trap the gas. The rumen inflates like a balloon until it presses against the animal's lungs. Unless action is taken quickly to relieve the pressure, the animal suffocates.

A concentrated diet of corn can also give a cow acidosis. Unlike our own highly acidic stomachs, the normal pH of a rumen is neutral. Corn renders it acidic, causing a form a bovine heartburn...Acidotic animals go off their feed, pant and salivate excessively, paw and scratch their bellies, and eat dirt. The condition can lead to diarrhea, ulcers, bloat, rumentitis, liver disease, and a general weakening of the immune system that leaves the animal vulnerable to the full panoply of feedlot disease[...]

Cattle rarely live on feedlots for more than 150 days...Over time, the acids eat away at the rumen wallo, allowing bacteria to enter the animal's bloodstream. These microbes wind up in the liver, where they form abscesses and impair the liver's function. Between 15 and 30 percent of feedlot cows are found at slaughter to have abscessed livers...in some pens, the figure runs as high as 70 percent.

What keeps a feedlot animal healthy -- or healthy enough -- are antibiotics. Rumensen buffers acidity in the rumen, helping to prevent bloat and acidosis, and Tylosin, a form of erythromycin, lowers the incidence of liver infection. Most of the antibiotics sold in America today end up in animal feed...public health advocates don't object to treating the animals with antibiotics; they just don't want to see the drugs lose their effectiveness because factory farms are feeding them to healthy animals to promote growth. But the use of antibiotics in the feedlot confounds this distinction. Here the drugs are plainly being used to treat sick animals, yet the animals probably wouldn't be sick if not for the diet of grain we feed them.

When I first came across that passage, I was suitably shocked and outraged, and in fact stopped eating meat for a few months (a practice I've since been unable to maintain). It didn't occur to me that this strategy of using powerful drugs as health maintenance devices in service of an unhealthy but cheaper diet is precisely what we're all doing with Lipitor, and Tums, and all the rest.

January 29, 2007 in Health and Medicine | Permalink

Comments

Did Pollan "adopt" a steer and follow it from pasture to feedlot and then recount the treatment of the animal in a Sunday NYT Magazine article? (As I recall, he decided to prevent the steer from going to the slaughterhouse and retired it to a ranch.)

Posted by: Danton | Jan 29, 2007 10:15:59 AM

I don't know if he did it in an article too, he certainly did it in his book.

Posted by: Ezra | Jan 29, 2007 10:21:15 AM

Ezra, you should really try again to give up meat from factory farms / modern agriculture. There are tons of great vegetarian options around. Here is a discussion and some links.

Posted by: Gore/Edwards 08 | Jan 29, 2007 10:42:00 AM

Depending on where you live, there is a fair amount of grass-fed beef (and buffalo) out there now. More expensive, but if you take Pollan's advice (from Thomas Jefferson) to "use meat as a sauce" it is not cost-prohibitive.

Cranky

Posted by: Cranky Observer | Jan 29, 2007 11:05:02 AM

Danton wrote: "Did Pollan "adopt" a steer and follow it from pasture to feedlot and then recount the treatment of the animal in a Sunday NYT Magazine article?"

Yes, in a NY Times magazine article called "Power Steer" on March 31, 2002. He did not pardon the cow, and even requested to watch the killing, but the slaughtering company wouldn't let him enter the slaughterhouse.

Feeding corn to cows not only makes them sick, it also can make the consumer sick. On page 82 of "the Omnivore's Dilemma", Pollan writes that most microbes in a grass-fed cow's gut have evolved to live in the neutral pH environment, and are therefore killed in our more acidic stomachs. Cows fed on corn have acidic rumens, which is where E.coli 0157:H7--one of the deadliest known bacteria--thrives. Since it can survive in a feedlot cow's gut, it can live in our acidic stomachs. Pollan writes that USDA research shows that just a few days of a diet of hay or grass before slaughter can dramatically reduce the population of E.coli 0157:H7. But the meat industry claims that it would be too expensive and complicated, and they propose irradiation instead.

This is a place where a huge meat buyer like McDonald's needs to step in and say "we want to avoid food poisoning, so feed the cattle grass for a few days." McDonald's has such power that the feedlot industry would find a way.

Posted by: meander | Jan 29, 2007 11:11:41 AM

Let me second the suggestion to seek out grass-fed meat. We buy all our meat (and milk, for that matter) from local farms that raise the animals on pasture. Not only is is it more healthy, it just plain tastes better. Yeah, it costs more than going to the supermarket, but we deal with that by eating less meat, which is a good thing in itself.

Posted by: Mike Jones | Jan 29, 2007 11:50:15 AM

I would question whether it's actually cheaper to produce beef this way, when you factor out subsidies. I don't know off the top of my head - but does anyone else? I guess I work in a veterinary school - I should ask around.

Posted by: Sara | Jan 29, 2007 12:21:34 PM

It strikes me that the availability of grass-fed beef gives meat-eaters a very quantifiable gauge of how much they're willing to spend for their convictions.

Posted by: Megan | Jan 29, 2007 12:56:51 PM

I like the idea of eating grass fed beef, but it should be pointed out that the phrase in your description of corn - "less land-intensive" - is no small thing. The reality is that cows are relatively huge mammals that can't be supported in the numbers we want on grass. That's pretty simple. The meat as sauce advice is, basically, adapt your eating habits to the environment, instead of re-engineering your environment to your eating habits. In the twentieth century, of course, we chose the latter course. It is probably not a system that will last forever. Interestingly, the change in the food system goes across ideologies - both the communist system and the capitalist attempted, successfully, to shrink the agricultural population drastically, while creating a factory system of farming - monoculture, factory animal farming, etc. I am not sure you can simply change the latter and maintain the production system that we have.

Posted by: roger | Jan 29, 2007 1:06:29 PM

I haven't read all of The Omnivore's Dilemma, but what I took away from it is that corn is going to be the undoing of America.

I do actually believe that humans evolved as omnivores and should eat accordingly. However, our food culture pretty much forces us into a situation where the majority of what we eat - meat, processed foods, grains, everything other than particular fresh produce - is corn. Even a vegetarian/vegan diet is often made up of so many processed foods that it becomes pretty much corn and soy.

If we are omnivores, then this much corn in our diet is no better for us than for cattle, especially the scientifically designed, hybridized and subsidized "corn" that is planted now.

The growth in farmer's markets, locally produced and grass-fed meats and such is our best bet for saving ourselves. My goal for 2007 is to get to the point where my family eats local produce and meat almost exclusively (citrus is hard to grow in Kansas). The more of us who do this, the less expensive it will become for everyone else.

Posted by: Stephen | Jan 29, 2007 1:32:48 PM

I'm not sure Pollan's analogy really goes through.

If we were using drugs as a way of staving off our evolving to fast-food diets, the drugs would need to be keeping us living past breeding age. From an evolutionary perspective it doesn't really matter if we die shortly after our children have become self-sufficient (modulo social effects on care and all that).

But don't most diseases from fast-food etc tend to kill those old enough to already have procreated?

Posted by: /a | Jan 29, 2007 1:48:01 PM

Grass-fed beef is better in a variety of ways. In addition to the points made already, it is better for small farmers and ranchers who often do raise their cattle on grass but sell to middlemen who then take them to feedlots for fattening on corn. The ranchers could actually get more money and the consumer a better product if the market for grass-fed beef was large enough to enable ranchers to sell more directly in local markets and skip the feedlots. That also helps preserve green space in areas where it's in a very vulnerable position. Many small ranchers practically make no money, while they could retire as millionaires by selling their land to developers. Ways of getting them more money for their product helps keep cities more compact.

Posted by: Sanpete | Jan 29, 2007 2:23:34 PM

Ezra, I've also not been as successful as I would have liked in staying away from meat; I now eat beef maybe 2 or 3 times a year, and to be honest I rarely enjoy it that much. Chicken farming and processing are also pretty gross, and now even fish consumption has its environmental implications. But it is challenging for busy Americans to eat a varied, healthy, vegetarian diet, even if you love beans.

If anyone wants to collaborate with me on a daily-reason-not-to-eat-meat calendar, holler back.

Posted by: Emily DeVoto | Jan 29, 2007 3:34:59 PM

Take Pollan with a grain of salt (the real gems are in the comments). When it comes to claims about food and health, I'd rather trust epidemiologists who've done research related to E. coli and cattle than the type of people who use phrases like "reductionist science."

Posted by: Alon Levy | Jan 30, 2007 1:06:58 AM

mmm beef..

http://www.hoodia-shop.co.uk/

Posted by: Hoodia Gordonii | Aug 1, 2007 11:25:25 AM

Help the homeless down the street and persuade them to look for work

Posted by: beer bottle collector | Aug 11, 2007 3:20:52 AM

Spam e-mails should be, should not be outlawed - Or: can, can not be outlawed, are examples of persuasive speech topic variants

Posted by: majors book store houston texas | Aug 12, 2007 5:11:58 AM

Blame the parents of a murderer parents for the crime

Posted by: archive florida lottery | Aug 23, 2007 3:40:13 PM

An integrated, segregated society is better

Posted by: dealer discount tire | Aug 27, 2007 1:20:06 AM

More or less nothing seems important. So it goes. Oh well. It's not important. That's how it is.

Posted by: addiction deprivation gambling online sleep | Aug 27, 2007 3:57:04 PM

We human are the one who have suffered at the end of the day. Isn't it SARs disease is passed on by pig where they were feed with antibiotics?

We should stop short cutting the growing process!

Posted by: diets and good health | Sep 25, 2007 7:42:21 PM

托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
钢托盘
木托盘
钢制托盘
托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
杭州托盘
成都托盘
武汉托盘
长沙托盘
合肥托盘
苏州托盘
无锡托盘
昆山托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
南京钢制托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘

托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
木托盘
塑料托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘


托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
托盘
塑料托盘

Posted by: JUDY | Sep 26, 2007 4:14:32 AM

Today was a complete loss. I've just been hanging out doing nothing. I've more or less been doing nothing. I can't be bothered with anything recently. I guess it doesn't bother me.

Posted by: tree | Sep 29, 2007 2:50:42 PM

Today was a complete loss. I've just been hanging out doing nothing. I've more or less been doing nothing. I can't be bothered with anything recently. I guess it doesn't bother me.

Posted by: John | Oct 2, 2007 8:23:48 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.