« A Charles Murray Reader | Main | A Tale of Two Articles »
January 19, 2007
A "Historic" Compromise
There's little I loathe more than a useless compromise that grabs headlines while undercutting serious attempts at reform. So excuse me if this "historic" compromise between everyone from insurers to AARP to Families USA to the American Medical Association leaves me with little but an arched eyebrow and a sense of annoyance.
What're Families USA doing? They're good guys!
This supergroup combining legendarily malicious actors with a couple genuine do-gooders appears to think their latest pact for covering the uninsured ranks somewhere between the Yalta conference and the Treaty of Paris. I must disagree. The plan, as composed, offers three phases for coverage expansion. Phase I insures the kids, gives states some money to experiment, and offers some new tax credits. Phase II we "give the states the option to expand Medicaid eligibility to all adults...below the poverty line." Ohreallycanweplease!? Then it offers subsidies to buy private care.
This is what I'll call an unacceptable plan. It uses the cover of universality -- and I'm not even sure it achieves that -- to sacrifice the necessary, more fundamental reforms needed to make our health system better, fairer, more affordable, more efficient, more humane, and less damaging to personal freedom and autonomy. It is the industry's way of pretending to be part of the reform conversation, and it signals their fear of more substantive changes. That AARP and Families USA jumped on board to offer cover is incomprehensible -- those organizations know better, and they should act better.
In coming weeks, I'll talk more about what a decent health system will look like, and hopefully start a conversation over what progressives will accept, given that most already know what they want. Having those boundaries (the ideal as well as the merely worthy) clearly defined is crucial as we move forward, as this moment progresses, and as self-interested stakeholders try to preserve the status quo by calling minor tweaks "change" and labeling their nonexistent concessions "historic." Those interested in a better system need to be clear on what elements cannot be compromised. This plan, for its part, doesn't compromise a single element of the current mess. All it does is accelerate profits to those already making plenty.
Dr Steve, by the way, has more.
January 19, 2007 in Health Care | Permalink
Comments
Wow. That looks atrocious.
Posted by: weboy | Jan 19, 2007 2:07:11 PM
the AARP supported medicare part D and is run by a Gingrich toadie. I am not surprised at them, though I do not know of the other group
Posted by: jesus jones | Jan 19, 2007 6:50:09 PM
the AARP supported medicare part D
That was widely understood to be a tactical move on the way to better things, and it will probably work out that way.
Posted by: Sanpete | Jan 19, 2007 7:20:08 PM
AARP has been little more than an insurance shiller for a while now. They went along with the doughnut hole plan too.
Posted by: emjaybee | Jan 19, 2007 9:47:29 PM
I knew the plan would be unacceptable when I saw that the US Chamber of Commerce was involved.
Posted by: MarvyT | Jan 19, 2007 10:47:15 PM
The AARP is like a labor union. Their sole concern is the welfare of their members. Their members already are universally covered, and for the most part get excellent care. Indeed, to the extent that expanding coverage among the non-elderly could exert additional cost pressures that might negatively impact retired people (by, say, triggering more robust rationing), the AARP's logical interest in the short term might well be to oppose fundamental reform. After all, why support "Medicare for all" when what you're supporting could ultimately translate into only a modestly larger pie being shared by a much larger group of pie eaters. This is all the more true when one considers their lucrative side line in selling insurance.
Posted by: Jasper | Jan 20, 2007 8:48:06 AM
Their members already are universally covered
You can join when you're 50. Many members don't have coverage.
Posted by: Sanpete | Jan 20, 2007 12:11:48 PM
You can join when you're 50. Many members don't have coverage.
I don't know about "many" -- I'd bet the overwhelming majority of AARPers have health insurance -- surely in higher numbers than the general public.
Look, I've got no beef with the AARP. They're rational, self-interested players looking out for their members' interests. Bully for them, that's the American way. One of these days my own interests will coincide with theirs. I just don't think anybody who supports fundamental healthcare reform in the US should look at the AARP as an ally -- or at least an ally that will be bought cheaply. Hopefully events will prove me wrong.
Posted by: Jasper | Jan 20, 2007 2:44:36 PM
Rather than helping people over 50 and seniors as they claim AARP is ripping senior citizens off,it burns me up everytime i see their ad on t.v.and when i get one in my postal mail i always write them back telling them they are nothing but crooks.This may not(but i bet it is)be so in every area of the country but here is what i found.
I have 2 vehicles i insure i contacted Hartford Insurance through my AARP card they sent me a quote for the very same coverage that i already had their price liked $10.00 being double what i was paying for insurance i had found on my own.It is true that almost yearly i check for the cheapest insurance i can get for the coverage i need,i refuse to stay with insurance companys that jack their prices up after your first year premium ends.
As far as i know i have checked every insurance company out that AARP offers that includes,Life Ins.Burial Ins.Home owners Ins.Health Ins.Medicare Supplmental Ins.i am sure there are others i have checked out and everytime i have been able to get insurace on my own cheaper than rip off AARP offers.A lot cheaper,as far as i am concerned AARP is a liar in their advertisements and are a big rip off.I will be 70 years old in October and i stopped fooling with AARP 15 years ago,but occasionally i still check up on their insurance and get mad and send them a letter telling them they are crooks and ripping off senior citizens.
Of course they never answer my letters.I saw that AARP recieved three hundred million from the insurance companys last year,that's money senior citizens and people over 50 are actually paying them.Their credit card offers are rip offs also.Thanks for letting me blow off steam,but AARP needs to be investigated.
Sincerely,
Joseph W.Osborne
P.S.I live in southern Indiana.
Posted by: Joseph W.Osborne | Aug 24, 2007 4:34:23 PM
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
钢托盘
木托盘
钢制托盘
托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
杭州托盘
成都托盘
武汉托盘
长沙托盘
合肥托盘
苏州托盘
无锡托盘
昆山托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
南京钢制托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
木托盘
塑料托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
Posted by: judy | Sep 26, 2007 4:44:13 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.