« Things That Make Me Proud To Be A Journalist | Main | "The Devil" Maximizes Profits »

July 17, 2006

My Oh My, We Do Have a Better Press Corps

Having already offered up an example of the press corps at its worst, let me now turn to how it looks at its best. Last week saw the release of data showing federal tax revenues far exceeding estimates. True to form, the Bush administration credited its tax cuts, arguing that they spurred the economy, generated massive growth, and proved Supply Side Economics. Arthur Laffer lives!

Given the press corps' usual facility with economic data, the coverage went roughly as expected: Some numbers explaining the increase in revenue, some quotes from administration officials crowing over the news, some quotes from some other folks tempering their joy, and a meaningless rundown of clashes over tax cuts. The Wall Street Journal, however, let Greg Ip and Deborah Solomon actually report out the story, which is how they created that rarest of all things: A newspaper article that takes the news and helps you understand it.

Ip and Solomon found that growth had not, in fact, exceeded government estimates, which means that the revenues exceeding estimates couldn't have come from the growth, or else the numbers would have surprised no one. Rather, the increase in treasury receipts came because inequality increased beyond estimates. Digging into the numbers, they report that "[t]he share of national income going to corporations and the wealthiest individuals, already large, has expanded, while the share going to typical wage earners has shrunk. Because corporations and the wealthy generally pay income tax at higher rates than does the typical wage earner, that shift benefits the federal Treasury." Put another way, the federal income tax is progressive. When rich people make more money, they pay relatively more of it into the treasury than would middle class folks were they enjoying the same windfall. Because the economy is becoming ever-more unequal and growth is really only helping corporations and the very rich, the treasury got more cash while the middle class received less benefit from the economic expansion than would be expected. I wonder if the Bush administration plans to crow about that?

On a related note, Michael Kinsley just underwent brain surgery. In his charming and humorous article on how he reacted to the news, he mused that "my first words coming out of surgery are so important. They have got to tell the world—and convince myself—that I am all there." In a postscript to the piece, Time informs us that the surgery went fine, and Kinsley first words were "Well, of course, when you cut taxes, government revenues go up. Why couldn't I see that before?" The man's a legend in his own time.

Crossposted at Tapped

July 17, 2006 | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference My Oh My, We Do Have a Better Press Corps:


As you wrote earlier, I think, the Journal is read by businessmen. They cannot afford to have their view of the world be distorted by crude reporting, or else their companies will drive off a cliff.

Having consistently accurate news and analysis is a must for the business community, with an immediacy not found in other parts of society. Academics, for example, can happily achieve tenure and publish papers and books based on fundamentally wrongheaded theories of the world, so long as the conventions of the trade are followed.

Posted by: Mastiff | Jul 19, 2006 9:17:58 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.