« CrackBerries: Another New York Times Fake Problem! | Main | Racism and "Post-Racism" »

December 04, 2005

Girly Men

Shakes here...

Senator Huggy McClingman, sometimes also known as John McCain, appeared on Meet the Press in a new capacity today—as an expert on emotionalism. And who are we to argue with someone who clearly isn’t afraid to show his emotions, even toward a man whose 2000 campaign branded his wife a junky and started a whisper campaign that his adopted Bangladeshi daughter was his illegitimate black child? I mean, that’s someone whose experience tells us love conquers all. Or, failing love, an unfettered desire for power.

Anyhoo, McCain’s expertise on said topic was in full flourish this morning, as he opined on the motives of his colleague, Rep. Murtha.

MCCAIN: I think he has become too emotional and understandably so. He goes to funerals. He goes, as many of us do, out to Walter Reed, and he sees the price of war. And I think that that has had some effect on him…

I see McCain’s point. It’s probably better to avoid funerals of fallen soldiers altogether so as not to compromise one’s bull-headed determinism to “stay the course” with a little thing like emotion. Or reality.

A cursory glance at Murtha’s explanation for his resolution makes evident that his decision was, in fact, informed by fact and reason. Emotion may well have played a part, as would be expected, since he’s a human being and all. That said, isn’t it interesting to watch a GOP party hack suggest that even if the genesis of his resolution had been sheer visceral emotion, it would be a terrible thing? This is, after all, the party whose current president prides himself on his gut-based decision-making, which is just a “manly” euphemism for a reliance on emotional responses.

Real men have instinct. Liberals have emotion. Girly men.

When all else has failed, conservatives inevitably conjure more of their pathetic sexist innuendo. Left without a reasonable counter, McCain casts Murtha as hysterical, too emotional, incapable of reason. It’s the same rusty pot of antiquated sludge from which they pull their criticisms of women, and because their port of last call when they’ve been outmatched is to conflate liberal men with—ick!—girls, Murtha gets the same treatment.

Tune in next week when Ken Mehlman accuses Harry Reid of having cooties.

December 4, 2005 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c572d53ef00d83463780853ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Girly Men:

Comments

That's an absolutely awful picture for McCain. Not just because he's hugging Bush, but because he looks tiny beside Bush.

Posted by: Neil the Ethical Werewolf | Dec 4, 2005 6:06:44 PM

I saw Murtha on this morning speaking, and he was nothing if not tough-sounding about the situation in Iraq, while McCain sounded more like a little sheeple when discussing the federal deficit and taxes.

Posted by: David W. | Dec 4, 2005 8:27:04 PM

McCain is really trying to keep himself viable with the party for the next presidential run. It's hard to believe that he can be blind to how much he now looks like a disingenuous party whore to those independents who for a time saw him as a possible honest alternative.

Posted by: sparrow | Dec 4, 2005 10:00:31 PM

Murtha sounds to me like a hardnosed Marine whose seen the world and knows what pain is. If that make shim girly and emotional, then I say we need more girly men as leaders.

Posted by: Keith | Dec 5, 2005 10:13:40 AM

Seems to me Shakes that you are the one who is immediately equating 'emotional' with 'girly.'

Posted by: Dave Justus | Dec 5, 2005 12:06:39 PM

Murtha's resolution is based on fact and reason. Its his finally coming out and telling the world about it that was likely based on emotion. No more biting the lip. And why shouldn't he? It pains me greatly to see/hear about each and every death and injury coming from Iraq. I can't even imagine what it must be like to up close with it all.

Posted by: Adrock | Dec 5, 2005 12:38:09 PM

Again: hardcore liberals should not like McCain. The question is whether people in the middle do. He was advertised as the best of all possible Republicans, and I still believe he is. He continues to fight against torture and defense over-spending in ways I can only admire.

Posted by: Tony Vila | Dec 5, 2005 3:08:27 PM

Dave Justus : Do the words irony or satire resonate with you at all ? I recognize when McCain just got slammed as unstable.

Posted by: opit | Dec 5, 2005 3:33:50 PM

McCain, how does one allow themself to be used so shamelessly. I can't figure out what McCain stands for. To me he appears to go which ever way the wind is blowing. He's trying to hard to ride the middle of the fence. To many political parties within a political party. Well, I guess "if you can't convience them . . . confuse them". Seems to work.

Posted by: Outfield Angel | Dec 8, 2005 5:30:40 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.