« Workers’ Rights Initiative | Main | Doors »
November 12, 2005
Birth, Blood, Buses
By Pepper of the Daily Pepper
Like Neil, I'd like to consider focusing more on individuals in the schools. In Newsweek's remembrance of Rosa Parks, Ellis Cose writes,
In the newly published "The Shame of the Nation," Jonathan Kozol sheds a book's length of tears over segregation in schools. He cites research that shows segregation is worsening and notes that three fourths of black and Latino children attend schools with no or relatively few whites. It is a daunting task to convince poor, minority kids they can learn "when they are cordoned off by a society that isn't sure they really can," writes Kozol.
Ezra has covered this topic before, but the questions are worth asking again and again. Is this what the civil-rights movement was for? Fighting against segregation just so it can happen again? It is hard to find opportunity in public schools, harder than ever. The wealthier and whiter families are in the suburbs, where their property taxes go to fund nicer schools.
Don't kid yourself that this is an inner-city problem, either. Rural schools are equally hard hit. Even if it is a mostly white region, you'll see the differences along class lines. We are now in an America where birth and blood mean a lot in terms of how far you will go in life, and that fact doesn't seem American to me.
The schools must be desegregated - racially and economically - so the United States, where everyone should be able to move up in society, doesn't devolve into a caste system (if it hasn't already). How can we be a United States when most of us don't know anything about, to borrow the title of Jacob Riis' book, How the Other Half Lives?
Salon has an interview with Kozol that offers some suggestions on how to solve this problem. I recommend sitting through the commercial and reading the whole piece. I'll excerpt the last lines:
We have a meritocracy in the U.S. but it's increasingly a hereditary meritocracy in which the lines are both lines of class and of race. I didn't write this book simply to provoke another incestuous and interesting debate among inert liberals. I wrote this book to ask my liberal friends to get up off their asses and deal with an injustice which is right before their eyes. There are too many books about the heroic struggles of the 1960s and the courage people showed then. Those books exempt us from summoning up the courage we need to face the injustices from which we still benefit today.
So what do we do to desegregate schools - again? Is it time to start talking about busing seriously? Or would that be too painful to discuss? What happened to Katrina, and what's happening in France is forcing us to talk about it. Is it time to start talking about Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education again? I say yes, we're at the point where it's time to start busing. I don't think schools in lower-income districts will get the money they deserve until parents in higher-income areas have to send their kids over there. Most parents worry about their own kids, and if they worry that their kid will go to a "bad" school, then they might start caring about how other people's kids are educated.
PS - I read about Wake County, but surely it isn't the only place in that nation that has tried this. Anywhere else?
November 12, 2005 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c572d53ef00d8346023e253ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Birth, Blood, Buses:
Comments
A lot of the segregation in public schools is due to mirroring effects from surrounding neighborhoods, since government policy restricts most students to the single school in their geographic area.
I rant about it here.
Posted by: Mastiff | Nov 12, 2005 10:58:35 PM
The yearly funding for schools in Michigan is completely from the state and has been since the adoption of Proposal A in 1994. The money for capital improvements is still controlled locally.The state government has been leveling the amount of aid to each school district since then. Because of the previous funding imbalances between the different districts, a floor was set for per-pupil funding. The Detroit school district has recieved per-pupil funding which is near the top in the state. Unfortunately, the Detroit schools are still not performing well 10 years later. Money is not the entire answer although the school buildings could use some renovation. These schools are mostly black with a few whites and Latinos. Perhaps segregation itself is the problem? I don't think so. The problem may be with the support or lack of it from the student's neighborhood and home. I supported busing in the 70's but it didn't work, and it probably wouldn't do any good now. The charter schools in Michigan haven't proved to be any better than the public schools in their areas. I don't know what the solutions for minority schools are, but we need different approaches than we had in the past.
Posted by: Marv Toler | Nov 13, 2005 12:30:57 AM
Yeah, money isn't the whole issue. D.C.'s per-student spending is among the highest in the nation, yet the performance of the schools lags behind (most of )the rest of the country. Also, speaking from personal experience, I attended a rather diverse public high school, but of the 120 or so students (out of 450 in my class) who took AP classes, three were black and one was hispanic. So on paper, the school was well integrated, but the individual classes were still segregated (by race as well as income).
Now, maybe there's some benefit to be had from attending a diverse school, even if the classes you take don't reflect this diversity (I'm not sure, anybody know?), but just throwing everyone into the same building doesn't seem like it would really work.
Posted by: Matt F | Nov 13, 2005 3:13:43 AM
I don't think we're going to get anywhere on this until we decide what it is we want schools to do. Right now we ask for a schizophrenic laundry list of functions, from in loco parentis to babysitting to social laboratory to, yes, teaching.
Until we as a nation, or even as local communtites, figure out what we want, rearranging the kids like chess pieces will not get a desired result.
The other thing is that what we've seen from dealing with segregation is that social groups self segregate and there's not a lot that can stop it. Race, class, educational background... all of these help define who many of us choose to be with. I'm not saying we don't want to expose kids to things they might not otherwise see or experience - I think that's what learning is all about. But we shouldn't kid ourselves that doing that will "solve" a situation many don't see as a problem.
I think many people who sort of vaguely embrace what Kozol's suggesting don't consider how wrenching, painful and uncomfortable that kind of social change can be. The sixties into the seventies were not light and pleasant where these issues were concerned. Change is uncomfortable and difficult. And because of that, many people would rather avoid it. I'm not saying I don't believe in change, even radical change; but don't kid yourslef that it's easy. And real change, that really takes hold, is a slow gradual process, and I think some advocates want a "right now" solution.
And when somebody can show me that they've taken all of that into consideration and still have a workable proposal, I'm happy to look at it.
Posted by: weboy | Nov 13, 2005 8:48:15 AM
Pepper,
Great post. If you ever get the chance to meet Kozol personally or attend one of his speeches/public appearances, do it. His continued work as an advocate of poor children and their families and access to quality public education sometimes takes its toll personally. I think I remember him saying he became profoundly depressed while he was researching and writing "Savage Inequalities." But, as his new book points out, he never quits.
Posted by: cali dem | Nov 13, 2005 12:46:40 PM
The wake county article says this approach was tried in LaCrosse, Wisconsin, and they observed no improvement in performance among low-income students. I think it's also been tried somewhere in Ohio as well.
Posted by: Nicholas Beaudrot | Nov 13, 2005 4:17:51 PM
Just fund all schools equally, and when that doesn't change anything, admit it's not money but individual choices students and parents make that causes them to succeed or fail.
Posted by: Adam Herman | Nov 14, 2005 6:36:35 AM
I'm going to have to agree with Adam on this one.
Perhaps the issue is that "upper class" parents focus more on education? There is a certain respect for being intelligent and reverence for learning that can only be instilled in the home and community. When kids are allowed to say "why am I learning this, I'll never use it", teachers can't correct them. Only parents and mentors can.
So let's fund all schools equally, and without this property tax nonsense, and make sure that they all have AP classes available to allow the best to excel. In the focus on helping the "less gifted" the best and brightest have suffered.
Posted by: Tito Villalobos | Nov 14, 2005 11:33:55 AM
Just fund all schools equally, and when that doesn't change anything, admit it's not money but individual choices students and parents make that causes them to succeed or fail.
Well...that sounds great. Except its not entirely true. Lets take a friend of mine, kids are in a Chicago Public School. She lives in a public housing development. She has two sons. Her younger son, 8, is doing great in school, she's very involved with them, helping them with their homework, they're in tutoring at the Y twice a week, and all this in the face of an utterly crappy school. Her older son, 13, is doing terribly in school: acting up, not getting good grades, all sorts of stuff. She has tried everything she can, she's on the phone with his teachers, her mother (who babysits them until she gets home from work), the leave no child behind helpline every other day. She's at the school probably once a week. She's at the end of her rope.
She's been trying to get her son tested for learning disorders for the last year (since we've been working together) and the school has dicked around and done nothing and lost her requests for testing. I started asking her about specific things...and honestly, he's pretty clearly dyslexic, as I understand the disease. He does great in math, fails horribly in anything involving reading and often reverses letter orders. This kid is 13, its obvious to me that he's dyslexic, and his school never even noticed nor will they get off their asses to test him for anything after a whole YEAR. If they'd caught it when he was young, like with kids who I went to school with in the burbs, he could be reading at grade level now.
But its totally her fault. For being black. And living in the projects. Its all the choices you make.
Posted by: rabbit | Nov 15, 2005 1:42:09 PM
Just fund all schools equally, and when that doesn't change anything, admit it's not money but individual choices students and parents make that causes them to succeed or fail.
Well...that sounds great. Except its not entirely true. Lets take a friend of mine, kids are in a Chicago Public School. She lives in a public housing development. She has two sons. Her younger son, 8, is doing great in school, she's very involved with them, helping them with their homework, they're in tutoring at the Y twice a week, and all this in the face of an utterly crappy school. Her older son, 13, is doing terribly in school: acting up, not getting good grades, all sorts of stuff. She has tried everything she can, she's on the phone with his teachers, her mother (who babysits them until she gets home from work), the leave no child behind helpline every other day. She's at the school probably once a week. She's at the end of her rope.
She's been trying to get her son tested for learning disorders for the last year (since we've been working together) and the school has dicked around and done nothing and lost her requests for testing. I started asking her about specific things...and honestly, he's pretty clearly dyslexic, as I understand the disease. He does great in math, fails horribly in anything involving reading and often reverses letter orders. This kid is 13, its obvious to me that he's dyslexic (or at least warrants being tested for it), and his school never even noticed nor will they get off their asses to test him for anything after a whole YEAR. If they'd caught it when he was young, like with kids who I went to school with in the burbs, he could be reading at grade level now.
But its totally her fault. For being black. And living in the projects. Its all the choices you make.
Posted by: rabbit | Nov 15, 2005 1:43:31 PM
sorry for the double post. :-(
Posted by: rabbit | Nov 15, 2005 1:44:08 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.