« Richardson's Health Plan | Main | Price Transparency in the Wedding Industry »
May 10, 2007
In Praise and Pessimism of Multipolarity
Timothy Garton Ash has an interesting appreciation of Blair's brand of internationalism in today's LA Times. Ash got the Prime Minister on the phone and asked him "to give...a balance sheet of his foreign policy over the last decade. The essence of Blairism in foreign policy, he told me, is liberal interventionism." Ash digs through the history and lauds liberal interventionism in the cases of Kosovo and multilateralism, but in his rush to write off the "overwhelming red figure" of Iraq, he argues that to "describe it as a case of liberal interventionism is the greatest disservice anyone could do to the cause of liberal interventionism." That seems quite backwards: Liberal interventionism's great sin was to give us Iraq. If you want to redefine the approach in such a way that it won't abet such wars in the future, you have to actually do that, not just write off a conflict that easily sold on liberal interventionist grounds.
Looking forward, Ash writes:
Britain alone is no longer big enough to sway the hyperpower. What the U.S. needs is a friend big enough that Washington has to listen to it. That friend can only be a strong European Union, speaking with a single voice.
This seems an odd lesson to pull from the Blair years, given that Tony Blair obviously disagreed with Chirac, Schroeder, and other prominent European leaders. No conceivable EU could have stayed the British prime minister's hands during a moment of foreign policy disagreement. Moreover, George W. Bush didn't reward Blair's friendship with deference to Blair's policy priorities or efforts to favor Britain's agenda, but another president conceivably could have, and that incentive structure will make a unified EU all the harder. I find all this slightly dispiriting, as a strong, liberal counterweight would be a welcome addition to the world stage. But the EU will never be it, just as 52 North American countries all bound by trade agreements and a loose federation would've never seen President Howard Dean's sovereign country of Vermont going along with Texas's invasion of Iraq.
May 10, 2007 | Permalink
Comments
Wait ... what? Why is Iraq well sold on liberal interventionist grounds? Iraq was sold on WMD, not out of a desire to spread democracy or stop humanitarian strife.
Obviously, a lot of left-of-center types convinced themselves that Saddam was a bad guy, and so it would be a good use of force to get rid of him. But it's not as though he was engaged in genocide against the Kurds or Shia at that moment. Had Bush suggested we invade Iraq to spread democracy and get more allies in the War on Terror, I think there would have been more anti-war voices than Phil Donahue.
Liberal interventionism's great sin was to give us lots of people who had grown too used to thinking that Western militaries were basically unstoppable, that modern warfare was unpleasant but had basically minimal civilian/human costs, and that the US would always apply force only where appropriate, having Done The Right Thing in Gulf War I, Bosnia, Haiti, and Kosovo (and, if we're including the UK, the Falklands and the Iranian Embassy). If your team has batted 1.000 over the last decade, and the coach says it's time to suit up, you expect it to be just like all the previous games.
Posted by: Nicholas Beaudrot | May 10, 2007 3:21:02 PM
Nicholas has some good points on WMD being the real issue that bought the support or silence of much of the US Dems, and part of the left. Iraq I in 90 led us to think of how easy a 'remove Hussein' war might be. In Iraq I, we didn't attempt an occupation using US group troops, and previous major occupations in Japan and Germany were after unconditional surrenders and totally broken societies/economiies.
As to the UK, I think both the UK and the US would be better off if the UK just fully joined the EU and put aside the 'special relationship'. The UK would be better off because they need to concentrate of making the EU a real power and they also need to stop being a lapdog to the US - which is all their real power can provide.
The US would be better off because we'd have to be willing to stand alone if the united EU/Japan was united in oppposition or unwillingness to go along, and the US public has much less appetite for go it alone military and defense policy (in their wisdom). We need to get off our Empire horse (which has been flogged to near death), and realize we are NOT the 'indispensible nation' and our economic power is rapidly decreasing. The one thing I can say Bush was right about in 2000 is that the US should act with humility in foreign affairs. That was his biggest lie of all, it turns out.
Posted by: JimPortlandOR | May 10, 2007 6:45:52 PM
U.S. administrations have almost always sold their imperialist interventions to the American public as liberal interventions (bringing freedom and democracy to the oppressed peoples of the world). Yes, you scare people with WMD, terrorism, communists are going to get your grandmother, but you also appeal to their desire for making the world a better place (spreading freedom and democracy). Works every time.
Posted by: mijnheer | May 11, 2007 12:34:41 AM
As Nicholas said, the Iraq war was justified based on WMD, not liberal interventionism. If Bush were a liberal interventionist, he would have stopped the genocide in Darfur rather than invading Iraq.
Posted by: Kenneth Almquist | May 11, 2007 10:30:11 PM
Bear in mind that in Britain (Ash's piece first ran in the Guardian a while back) the war was sold much more on humanitarian intervention, especially by the "decent left" hawks, than it was on mushroom clouds. After Kosovo and 9/11 Blair made a serious of speeches espousing the idea of more expansive liberal interventionism.
Posted by: Ginger Yellow | May 12, 2007 7:51:04 AM
liqingchao 07年08月30日
google排名
google排名
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
power leveling
power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power level
wow power level
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling
Crm
Crm
呼叫中心
呼叫中心
客户关系管理
客户关系管理
北京月嫂
北京月嫂
china tour
china tour
hongkong hotel
hongkong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour
北京律师
北京律师
礼品
礼品
礼品公司
礼品公司
会议礼品
会议礼品
商务礼品
商务礼品
保洁
保洁
保洁公司
保洁公司
翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
鼓风机
风机
风机
货架
光盘刻录
光盘刻录
光盘制作
光盘制作
光盘印刷
光盘印刷
红外测温仪
红外测温仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
频闪仪
频闪仪
涂层测厚仪
涂层测厚仪
电火花检测仪
电火花检测仪
google排名
集团电话
集团电话
网站设计
网站设计
多媒体
监控
监控
搬家公司
搬家公司
条码打印机
条码打印机
Posted by: wslmwps | Aug 30, 2007 2:15:54 AM
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
钢托盘
木托盘
钢制托盘
托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
杭州托盘
成都托盘
武汉托盘
长沙托盘
合肥托盘
苏州托盘
无锡托盘
昆山托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
南京钢制托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
木托盘
塑料托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
Posted by: judy | Oct 8, 2007 6:02:45 AM
generic retin a buy generic retin a online
stop smoking medication buy stop smoking medication online
generic zyban buy generic zyban online
thyroid medication buy thyroid medication online
buy synthroid online buy generic synthroid online
hoodia gordonii diet pills buy hoodia gordonii online
hoodia patch buy hoodia patch online
Viagra Online Viagra Online
Posted by: lisa | Oct 23, 2007 4:11:10 AM
Gay couples should be, should not be allowed to marry
Posted by: pink visual | Jan 1, 2008 3:08:50 AM
Al consumo critico antiracket lÒOscar della partecipazione civica
Posted by: sex video chat | Jan 2, 2008 9:03:05 AM
Life is designed by some sort of intelligence, God created life
Posted by: all access adult movie | Jan 4, 2008 9:35:49 PM
Not much on my mind right now. Today was a complete loss. So it goes. I've just been sitting around waiting for something to happen. I've basically been doing nothing , but I guess it doesn't bother me.
Posted by: liveprivat | Jan 9, 2008 2:59:11 AM
Super natural activity exists, doesn't exist
Posted by: horny cheer | Jan 27, 2008 9:59:24 AM
Cousin dating is, is not okay
Posted by: cartoon 69 | Jan 30, 2008 7:33:31 AM
I haven't been up to anything. My mind is like an empty room, but such is life. Maybe tomorrow. Today was a loss, but eh.
Posted by: pornstars | Jan 31, 2008 7:52:19 AM
People are too strict on other people
Posted by: captainstabbin adventure | Feb 5, 2008 9:44:47 AM
A full body x-ray scan is an effective method of maintaining a high level of security
Posted by: firsttimeswallows passwords | Feb 6, 2008 6:35:06 AM
Parents have no right in spanking you - Or do they? That could be another persuasive speech topic
Posted by: amateur xxx model | Feb 8, 2008 6:52:55 PM
A full body x-ray scan is an effective method of maintaining a high level of security
Posted by: xxx gay fetish | Feb 13, 2008 2:14:07 PM
Power to the people is, is not a good idea
Posted by: iteens | Mar 6, 2008 9:43:33 PM
So you can not be defeated by other players and you are the most players in the game. Every player I think in this game will want to play the game with you together.
Posted by: GuildWars money | Dec 12, 2008 3:48:17 AM



