« Link of the Day: Hezbollah Sucks Edition | Main | More Corner Compliments »

July 14, 2006

Strange Bedfellows Department

I don't say this very often, but I agree with Tim Graham. Journalisming isn't very hard. For Matt Bai to compare it to practicing medicine in the ER is a little...unseemly. At its most basic level, being a journalist is rather trivial -- particularly in the Bai school of thought, where you write down what somebody said and then think up some clever imagery for the way their eyebrows wiggle while they talk. Indeed, it's because writing and journalisming are pretty easy that I hardly think of them as my job, and have trouble understanding those who do. Too often, I think, journalists conceive of their duties as paying proper respect to a set of techniques that comprise some Platonic Good known as Journalism. Under this rubric, the relevant metrics are really about how many opposing quotes you've got, and whether you're the first with the story, and how your lede looks, and a variety of other things that render your responsibilities technical, rather than informative or ideological, in nature. It's rather reductive, and doesn't encourage, in my opinion, a very strong product.

As I see my job, I'm paid to spend a fair amount of time learning about policy, reading think tank reports, talking to experts, studying academic research, and better understanding important events, so that I can then deploy this other tool in my box -- writing -- to correctly explain, contextualize, and evaluate the world for my readers. My ultimate responsibility is to my readers and the country's larger political dialogue -- it's the impact I have, not the product I turn out, that measures my success. And under that rubric, the Journalism Gods just aren't an important constituency.

July 14, 2006 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c572d53ef00d834a1a14953ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Strange Bedfellows Department:

Comments

Oh, Ezra. You're never going to amount to anything, are you?

Posted by: Stephen | Jul 14, 2006 4:24:58 PM

Amen!

Journalism as ER MD? Hogwash. Talk about delusion. The NYT as a job does not make one become more than a steno if what you actually do is stenography.

Posted by: JimPortlandOR | Jul 14, 2006 4:49:53 PM

The comparison here is based on the perceived ridiculousness of someone unpracticed in a profession giving advice to someone practiced in it, not on an assumed one-to-one correspondence between brain surgery and journalism, which, should it be made, we can all agree would be specious.

Posted by: Farinata X | Jul 14, 2006 4:51:19 PM

I just got done reading a piece from Bai wherein he traveled with soldiers in Iraq to places where he very easily could have been killed. Your snarky, trivializing swipe at him seems petty and a little jealous, despite your overall point being solid.

Posted by: Realish | Jul 14, 2006 6:32:43 PM

Read some more pieces by Bai. Or run a search on my site. I think he trivializes politics to an infuriating degree. There are many journalists I'm jealous of -- he's not one.

Posted by: Ezra | Jul 14, 2006 7:36:52 PM

My ultimate responsibility is to my readers and the country's larger political dialogue -- it's the impact I have, not the product I turn out, that measures my success.

FWIW, this seems a slightly dangerous mindset, depending on how you define 'impact' - a whole lot of means can get justified towards that end, which is how we end up with truthiness.

Posted by: Pooh | Jul 14, 2006 8:43:29 PM

It just seems to me that identifying horseshit is an easy thing to do, regardless of your party affiliation.

Calling it horseshit just seems to be something that Dems do more often than GOPers.

And don't get me wrong, Dems don't do it very often.

The alternative is that people truly don't recognize the horseshit. The implications of this are disturbing. I would prefer to blame partisanship instead of cognitive ability. But that's just me.

In any event, I'd like to convene a blogger ethics panel on what exactly the definition of "fact" is. I do not think it means what I think it means.

Posted by: abjectfunk | Jul 15, 2006 4:22:27 AM

Post a comment