« Radio Klein | Main | Raise the Minimum Wage. Raise It Now. »

June 14, 2006

GM Has Learned Nothing

Believe me -- I'm shocked too, but this is actually a great column Tom Friedman's written puncturing the faux-environmentalism of GM. Right now, remember, GM is offering a year of unlimited gasoline at $1.99 a gallon for buyers of certain cars, trucks, and SUVs. Good plan? Sure is -- it's unlikely to cost more than a $1,000 per customer, but will have far more resonance than a similarly hefty rebate. That said, it's a treatment of symptoms so GM can avoid a cure; pay for the consumer's gasoline so they'll buy your inefficient autos. A better strategy might include more fuel efficient cars, but that's apparently out of the question. GM, after all, is already a leader in E85 compatible cars, a bullshit metric that Friedman capably eviscerates:

Ah, says Mr. Harris, but we offer nine vehicles that can run on E85 ethanol-gas blends, and have made 1.9 million such cars and trucks. Toyota makes none. The truth: The Big Three U.S. automakers started making flex-fuel cars in the mid-1990's after they were given a shameful federal loophole.

As the Des Moines Register explained in an article on May 26: "The loophole works this way: A dual-fuel vehicle that can run on either gasoline or 85 percent ethanol, or E85, is credited with a much higher mileage rating than it really gets. That keeps the overall mileage of the cars and trucks that a company like Ford or General Motors makes in any given year within the government's mileage limits."

By agreeing to build flex-fuel vehicles credited with phony mileage, Detroit gets to make many more bigger, heavier gas guzzlers, the paper explained, "without having to pay fines for exceeding the federal mileage standards." For instance, the 2006 G.M.C. two-wheel-drive Yukon 1500 actually gets 15 m.p.g. city and 20 m.p.g. highway. But under this loophole it is rated as getting 33 miles per gallon for purposes of meeting the government's fleet fuel economy standards. "The Union of Concerned Scientists calculates that the loophole increased U.S. oil consumption by 80,000 barrels per day in 2005 alone," the paper said.

If G.M., Ford and Chrysler really care about saving oil and the environment, why exploit this loophole? And by the way, even though G.M. has made 1.9 million flex-fuel vehicles, it and the other automakers for a long time did little to inform customers that their cars could run on ethanol — because their real interest was the mileage loophole to make more big cars. Most people didn't know they were driving a flex-fuel car. "Until recently, the only way to tell was by checking the vehicle identification number," the paper noted. Recently, General Motors has put yellow gas caps on its dual-fuel vehicles to alert customers.

It was, quite literally, the least they could do.

June 14, 2006 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/19450/5101246

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference GM Has Learned Nothing:

Comments

Of course, this is much easier than designing cars that are actually fuel efficient?

This is what happens when the free market collides with the public interest. Detroit is literally selling us a fantasy of a world where gas was cheap and evironmentalists were still just crazy lefties. Worse is that I'm sure a lot of people will go for it just to stick their headsa a bit further into the sand for a while.

Besides, $1.99, are they dreaming??

http://www.thehindsightfactor.com
*&^ *&^ *&^ *& ^*& ^* &^* &^*&^

Posted by: urthwalker | Jun 14, 2006 12:54:13 PM

why not close the loophole? oh wait, i forgot who we were dealing with here.

Posted by: merlallen | Jun 14, 2006 12:55:18 PM

And flex fuel capability is worthless in places with no E85. I see tons of those late 90s FFV Taurus in MA where I've never once seens E85 at any gas station ever. So even though they are producing the cars, there needs to be the fueling infrastructure to support them. But ofcourse thats not GMs fault, is it?

BTW, thanks for the reposting what was behind the Times Select Wall, I haven't read Friedman since!

Posted by: Adrock | Jun 14, 2006 1:05:12 PM

GM doesn't want to make E85 or any alterna-fuel popular because the price of gas would go up and up as demand lessened for a fuel that costs a lot of blood and money. and then who would buy their high-premium gasoline-burning vehicles instead of the relatively low-margin hybrids and FFVs?

it's all about the money, honey!

btw adrock, you actually look forward to reading friedman? wtf?

Posted by: almostinfamous | Jun 14, 2006 1:12:44 PM

Your blog was great, but I also want to praise you for correctly using the word "literally!"

Posted by: dAnimal | Jun 14, 2006 5:06:23 PM

I live near Detroit and we get to hear about the Big 3 every single day of the year. I understand that they provide A LOT of jobs here in South-East Michigan, but it really scares me that they continue more of the same year in and year out.

You think it would make a lot of sense to innovate and start producing cars that would drive UP demand. There is a reason that sales for SUV's seem to be going down and car yards have such a back supply of them.

But we get 'more-of-the-same' because that is where the easy money is when they do sell them. I do not consider myself to be an expert by any means, but all I can say is that I will be purchasing a car with the highest MPG sticker I can find next time around in a year or so. I do not care honestly if the car is made in Iran. I know I should be supporting US auto makers, but foreign cars are made here % wise just as much as the US cars are. Granted I guess the profits can go else where, but when the US automakers plan on getting their act together they can have my money.

Posted by: Stephen | Jun 15, 2006 9:10:41 AM

You guys, if the demand for gas goes down, the price goes DOWN, not up. If the SUPPLY goes down, the price goes up (which is what is happening right now). GM is making FFV's so that people will buy their vehicles, yes, but not in the demonized way you describe. If the price of gas goes up, they will sell fewer vehicles. Thus, they are promoting E85 to help lessen the cost of fuel, and therefore increase their sales.

Furthermore, the reason they did not publicize the fact that their vehicles would run on E85 is because without cars that run on the stuff, there was no reason to produce it. Only when there were a sufficient number of vehicles on the road could the marked to E85 become profitable and successful in the long run. If it had been produced and failed for lack of volume, it may have been remembered as a flop and never seen again.

So, hate GM all you want for making inefficient vehicles, but don’t hate them for making FFV's and hybrids, because that IS a step in the right direction, and as far as i know, none of the more efficient imports have done anything like it.

Posted by: homestar | Jun 19, 2006 4:22:12 PM

Hi!0hours wandered on the Internet yet has not found this
or Alex toyota hibrit.....
Thanks for precisely given information.I think that ezraklein.typepad.com shall visit every day
Yours faithfully,good buy!!



Posted by: toyotas | Mar 21, 2008 3:04:23 PM

Post a comment