« Richard Cohen Explains It All | Main | Be a Man: Eat Shit! »

May 04, 2006

Sizing up the Dark Horses

by Nicholas Beaudrot of Electoral Math

Mark Schmitt's got a nice list of potential 2008 Republican nominees. He carefully sizes up the baggage each one is carrying, showing just how few potential Presidents the party has. Newt Gingrich ends up being the most acceptable choice who can win the nomination. That might be right, and maybe if Al Gore and Newt Gingrich both run, we can all party like it's 1996, but I think Schmitt's list is a little short. Here are some other possible, less-mentioned, Republican Presidential candidates:

  • George Pataki. Pro-choice, and, apparently, incredibly boring. Didn't really do much to cut the size of Big Government in New York. Under any situation where he could become the nominee, it would be just as likely to go to ...
     
  • Rudy Giuliani. Curiously, in recent primary polling, Giuliani draws the most support from Bush supporters. So if Bush job approval stays above 55% among Republicans, perhaps he'll have a shot. That is, if the primary voters can get past his pro-choice & pro-gay past.
     
  • Mike Huckabee. My personal favorite Dark Horse Candidate. Pro-life? Check. Compassionate Conservatism? Check. Making the rounds on national TV outlets? Check. The real question for Huckabee is whether or not he'll be able to get by at a national level without support from anti-tax zealots like Grover Norquist.
  • Bill Owens. Once the darling of the anti-tax reactionaries for his support of Colorado's "taxpayers bill of goods rights", Owens was forced to "amend" TaBoR in order to balance the state budget without turning Colorado universities into de facto private schools. That may disqualify him. Plus, family issues might also hurt him in the Republican primaries.
     
  • Jeb. I believe his public statements on the matter have a non-denial denial quality to them ("I'm not thinking about running for President"), but I can't find a quote. But the notion of Jeb Bush as president isn't being taken serioulsy. Why? Will the country be afflicted with Bush fatigue in 2008? Will the younger brother be able to point to his record in Florida and show that he's a bipartisan problem solver? Perhaps this possibility ought to be thought about a bit more.
  • Haley Barbour. Right after the 2004 election, the Mississippi governor had a decent amount of buzz. He was one of the few politicians who ended up looking good in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. And he has deep connections to the Party's fundraising base from his time as RNC chair.
     

Update: how could I forget? Mr. Team America PAC himself, Tom Tancredo! Surely he has some appeal to Republican primary voters.

Assuming the remaining Republican Governors don't want to run, and the nominee won't be a current or former Bush Cabinet official (John Ashcroft, anyone?), that may be the full list. If I missed anyone, add them in the comments.

May 4, 2006 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/19450/4802629

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sizing up the Dark Horses:

Comments

ummmmm.......McCAIN!!!???

Posted by: Fred Jones | May 4, 2006 11:36:47 AM

Good job not clicking on the link there, Fred.

Posted by: micah | May 4, 2006 11:50:06 AM

Rudy Giuliani. Curiously, in recent primary polling, Giuliani draws the most support from Bush supporters. So if Bush job approval stays above 55% among Republicans, perhaps he'll have a shot. That is, if the primary voters can get past his pro-choice & pro-gay past.

I don't find that too curious. I didn't like Al Franken's "The Truth" as much as "Lies", but he made at least one good point. Everyone acts like Bush's base is all the theocrats and only the theocrats, but that's not entirely true. The much-publicized poll supposedly proving this in the aftermath of 2004 was the one where a (narrow) plurality of voters based their vote on "moral values". But that interpretation is either lucky accident or clever spin. In the same question, of the people who said terrorism was the most important issue, 86 percent voted for Bush.

So the point is, it's hard to seperate the Dobson part of Bush's base from the Hitchens part of Bush's base, but Giuliani would certainly do well among the latter group. This is really just armchair quarterbacking on my part; explaining Giuliani's performance isn't half as impressive or valuable as predicting it.

For myself, I'm going to pass on predicting 2008 and even 2006. There's just too much that could happen. There could be another terrorist attack, anti-Iranian rhetoric might help the "war party" or alternately might hurt them if it looks like too transparent a ploy, elected Democrats might get their act together... But Giuliani has a chance, and his centrist appeal (maybe I should say, lack of centrist offensiveness) puts him in the middle of that pack or better.

Posted by: Cyrus | May 4, 2006 11:51:34 AM

Good job not clicking on the link there, Fred.

BUSTED.

Posted by: Fred Jones | May 4, 2006 11:57:48 AM

No no no, the rule is that everyone should ignore Pataki's presidential aspirations!

Posted by: Jackmormon | May 4, 2006 2:39:07 PM

There will never be a President Huckabee.

I mean, really.

Posted by: Stephen | May 4, 2006 2:41:56 PM

There will never be a President Huckabee.

I'm inclined to think this is probably true. However, in part for that reason, a GOP candidate Huckabee would be a wonderful thing.

Posted by: djw | May 4, 2006 3:58:03 PM

There will never be a President Huckabee.

I'm inclined to think this is probably true. However, in part for that reason, a GOP candidate Huckabee would be a wonderful thing.

Posted by: djw | May 4, 2006 3:58:06 PM

For Giuliani to be the nominee, the party would have to decide that it could do without 99.999% of the African-American vote. The man has some serious baggage, which many New Yorkers will not let the rest of the country forget about if he gets on the national stage.

Posted by: Hob | May 4, 2006 10:04:27 PM

Hob, how much of the black vote do the Republicans get anyway? 2%? 3%? Equating to, what, 0.3% of the electorate, and so 0.15% of the votes? It's hardly going to make that much of a difference.

Posted by: ajay | May 5, 2006 11:39:41 AM

Guilanni's popularity is based on the same 'follow you guy, lead like a leader' sort of image-based following that makes otherwise sensible people talk about how good Bush looked in a flight suit. It's a mile wide and an inch deep. He'll lose half of it when they find out he's pro-choice. Probably more than half.

Posted by: NBarnes | May 5, 2006 6:16:31 PM

huckabee president?

never

Posted by: david arnest | Jan 29, 2007 2:25:34 AM

Post a comment