« Water, Water, Everywhere... | Main | I Concur »
March 16, 2006
Link of the Day: George Will is my BFF Edition
Will's column against the line item veto gets coveted LotD status today. The line-item veto allows the president to excise lines from bills passed by Congress, which is to say he can pick and choose what he wants to keep from what Congress passes. On the face of it, that's a fairly fine idea, one that could help control pork spending and tamp down on some of the worst in special interest excesses.
A bit deeper, though, and it's an awful concept, a further aggregation of power to the executive who'll then use the tool to punish his political enemies in Congress. The president is not constitutionally authorized to slice up legislation into more pleasing shapes, and giving him that authority short-circuits the ability of congressional leaderships to makes the deals that shepherd controversial legislation through committees. Neither outcome is good, but more compelling, to me, is the first. What we need right now is for Congress to re-exert their power against the executive, not further weaken their bargaining position.
March 16, 2006 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c572d53ef00d834b10ea269e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Link of the Day: George Will is my BFF Edition:
Comments
The president is not constitutionally authorized to slice up legislation into more pleasing shapes
What, you mean like with signing statements?
Posted by: paperwight | Mar 16, 2006 2:07:15 PM
Yeah, if you want to give the executive branch more power, then by all means, endorse the line-item veto. A better idea would be to force any member of Congress who wishes to attach a ryder to the bill to explain his peers why this is a related issue....OUT LOUD!
Posted by: Fred Jones | Mar 16, 2006 2:07:23 PM
In my book, Wisconsin has the most F-ed up line item veto powers. Tommy Thompson was notorious for doing things like crossing out the word "not" in a clause or for crossing out groups of letters until the remaining letters formed completely different words that suited him better! If you're going to give an executive line-item power, at least make him/her use it on complete clauses!
Posted by: diddy | Mar 16, 2006 2:26:02 PM
Lord of the Dance?
As omission is part of the process of creation, line-item veto clearly puts the president in the role of a legislator, which seems to me to be a very bad idea. It would be better to revise Congressional rules to make the packaging of unrelated items less frequent, although I won't hold my breath for that one.
Posted by: Royko | Mar 16, 2006 3:15:47 PM
... coveted ... status ... allows the president to excise lines from ... the face ... that's ... a fairly fine ... pork ... special ...
A ... deeper ... aggregation of power to the ... pleasing ... shepherd ... is good ... first. What we need ... is for Congress to ... weaken ...
Posted by: Hob | Mar 16, 2006 4:41:38 PM
...it's an awful concept, a further aggregation of power to the executive who'll then use the tool to punish his political enemies in Congress. The president is not constitutionally authorized to slice up legislation into more pleasing shapes,...
Exactly!
Posted by: JimPortlandOR | Mar 16, 2006 4:44:22 PM
仓储笼
仓储笼
折叠式仓储笼
仓库笼
南京仓储笼
上海仓储笼
北京仓储笼
广州仓储笼
杭州仓储笼
仓储笼
仓储笼
仓库笼
仓库笼
折叠式仓储笼
折叠式仓储笼
折叠仓储笼
折叠仓储笼
仓储笼
仓库笼
折叠式仓储笼
折叠仓储笼
仓储笼
仓储笼
仓储笼
仓库笼
折叠式仓储笼
仓储笼
仓库笼
折叠式仓储笼
蝴蝶笼
储物笼
南京仓储笼
上海仓储笼
北京仓储笼
广州仓储笼
仓储笼
仓库笼
折叠式仓储笼
蝴蝶笼
储物笼
南京仓储笼
上海仓储笼
北京仓储笼
广州仓储笼
仓储笼
仓库笼
折叠式仓储笼
储物笼
上海仓储笼
南京仓储笼
北京仓储笼
广州仓储笼
仓储笼
仓库笼
折叠式仓储笼
蝴蝶笼
储物笼
南京仓储笼
上海仓储笼
北京仓储笼
广州仓储笼
仓储笼
仓库笼
折叠式仓储笼
蝴蝶笼
储物笼
南京仓储笼
上海仓储笼
北京仓储笼
广州仓储笼
仓储笼
仓库笼
折叠式仓储笼
蝴蝶笼
南京仓储笼
上海仓储笼
北京仓储笼
广州仓储笼
Posted by: peterwei | Oct 22, 2007 6:53:31 AM



