« The Failing, Faltering Media | Main | ID: Where Domino Theory Works »

August 27, 2005

Knocking Down Domino Theory

By Ezra

Robert Farley does a bang-up job of, well, banging up domino theory today, and I'm glad to see him doing it.  From Ben Stein's insane editorials after Deep Throat revealed himself to Peggy Noonan's odd pivot at the end of the first chapter of her memoirs, the essential rightness of domino theory keeps popping up among right-wing "intellectuals" as proof of the left's basic naiveté and idiocy.  It shouldn't.  Domino theory is the sort of supratheory used as trump card by those who want to justify war when the conflict itself is unjustified.  It also, helpfully, lets them argue for indefinite warfare, even when our continued presence would render our immediate objectives harder to attain and do enormous damage to us, our enemies, and all civilians unlucky enough to become collateral.  That's the sort of theory that deserves extra-super-special scrutiny and domino theory, as it stands, doesn't hold up.

The threat in domino theory, of course, was that American weakness anywhere would embolden our enemies everywhere.  Proponents of it think that's what happened in Vietnam.  It isn't.  But now, those same, completely incorrect folks folks have gotten us into the domino theory downside in Iraq.  Well done!

If you were an Islamic terrorist, our retaliation post-9/11 could end in one of three outcomes, two of them good for you, one bad.  The bad outcome, which was largely achieved in Afghanistan, would be American victory with relatively little trouble that segued into a basically peaceful reconstruction.  The good outcomes would be American withdrawal after only a few casualties (paper tiger outcome) or some scenario where the Americans commit their forces but, despite their best efforts and willingness to expend treasure and life, lose, proving their much-vaunted might powerless before Allah.

In Iraq, we got that last outcome.  We attempted an aggressive conquest of a Muslim land and found ourselves essentially powerless before a rag tag insurgency.  It's like getting beat by the Bad News Bears, only this time, they think themselves holy warriors.  Kind of a pity.  Domino theory was wrong on the facts, but psychologically, it made sense.  Particularly when the enemy is a group of religious extremists looking for divine confirmation of their mission.  So for the few people who still believe in it to put us in a situation that does exactly what the theory feared, well, history sure likes its jokes.

August 27, 2005 in Iraq | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c572d53ef00d8345441dc53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Knocking Down Domino Theory:

Comments

Domino theory is the sort of supratheory used as trump card by those who want to justify war when the conflict itself is unjustified. It also, helpfully, lets them argue for indefinite warfare,...

Exactly! It is the substitute for thought, analysis, facts, historical understanding and common sense. Just what the rightist hawks like.

Pretty soon I expect them to drag out the communist world takeover that must be fought as we come on round the turn back to Vietnam.

"1-2-3 what are we fighting for?" Victory, of course, over something.

Posted by: JimPortlandOR | Aug 27, 2005 8:18:32 PM

I don't quite agree with this either. There are important differences between the Great Power competitions like France vs England in the 18th century or England vs Russia in Afghanistan....and the Cold War.

The Cold War, was as I remember, about competing ideologies (or a range of economic systems) at least as much as about competing states. The point wasn't that it was Russia financing the Vietnamese or Sandinistas, but that it was Communist Russia. The Cold War is comparable to the religious competition of the 16th and 17th centuries, perhaps. And Int'l competition between Catholicism and Protestantism persists to this day, in Africa and Latin America.

Now some Democrats might see our current fight as against Osama and Zarqwahi and five other bad guys who need to be brought to justice. But many see a fight against radical violent Islam, and a loss in Iraq would probably embolden our adversaries around the world.

Or in the complicated way these things go, as for instance Richelieu supporting Gustavus against the Spanish, perhaps in Iraq we are creating a strong Shia regional rival to the Sunni. We would not be likely to admit that publicly.

Posted by: bob mcmanus | Aug 27, 2005 10:02:04 PM

On specific dominoes, a Shia theocracy in Iraq I believe will have strong implications for Lebanon(Hezbollah), NE Saudi Arabia, and I think Qatar. The de facto independent Kurdistan will affect Syria,Turkey,and Iran.

A Sunni victory in Iraq is difficult to imagine, and since you said it was impossible, even tho the Sunni ruled Iraq for 700 years, we won't worry about it.

The "reverse Domino" theorey Wolfowitz and the Fearless Leader" and others professed as a justification wasn't provided enough resources to be even called an attempt, and was likely a delusion anyway.

Posted by: bob mcmanus | Aug 27, 2005 10:11:58 PM

To say nothing of the fact that Afghanistan's pretty much a mess, too.

Posted by: Jim Madison's Dog | Aug 28, 2005 8:24:06 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.