« Stuff to Read | Main | Alan Greenspan: Maestro or Hack? »
April 24, 2005
God, Guns, and Gandhi
My new practice of regularly reading NRO’s Corner is paying off in spades. Today, Andrew Stuttaford manages to stop bitching about Cameron Diaz long enough to make this bold assertion:
And as, for those ‘spiritual’ values that Diaz purports to find in picturesque hellholes such as Bhutan, I suspect that, given the chance, most of those bowers, scrapers and chanters would be pleased to junk their shamans, temples and priests in favour of running water, electricity and decent education.
And they would be right to.
Huh, okay. Let’s try that quote again, this time replacing a few words:
And as, for those ‘traditional’ values that Diaz purports to find in picturesque hellholes such as Brownsville, TX [which has a 45.5% child poverty rate], I suspect that, given the chance, most of those bowers, chanters and singers would be pleased to junk their bibles, churches and priests in favour of health care, job security and decent education.
And they would be right to.
So, setting aside your religious values in favor of quality-of-life improvements is the right thing to do. But only if you’re a member of one of those other religions. Fascinating.
Andrew Stuttaford’s book, "What’s The Matter With Calcutta," is available in hardcover from Regenry Books.
April 24, 2005 in Republicans | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c572d53ef00d83440d2e653ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference God, Guns, and Gandhi:
Comments
Awesome post.
Posted by: Ezra | Apr 24, 2005 11:55:17 AM
Stuttaford so doesn't get it at all. A beautiful example of what's wrong with our end of the world ...
Posted by: John H. Farr | Apr 24, 2005 12:38:00 PM
Niiiiiice one. right on...
Posted by: Anjali | Apr 24, 2005 2:07:20 PM
i bow to you, master of literary ju-jitsu
Posted by: almostinfamous | Apr 24, 2005 3:31:26 PM
Brilliant.
Posted by: Nathan | Apr 24, 2005 8:06:55 PM
The "primitive squalor from which mankind is – all too slowly – emerging." which Stuttaford refers is itself condescending, much worse than anything Diaz said, and let us recall in Stuttaford's frist paragrah - we're not supposed chastize attractive actresses.
And you know, if Diaz et al. wants to go to a mudhut and think it's "cool", that's great. And I bet they walk out of that mudhut giggling knowing more than most of the writers at the National Review regarding that other, "primitive squalor" world.
-s.e.
Posted by: Sam Ernesto | Apr 24, 2005 8:46:27 PM
bullseye!
Posted by: harry near indy | Apr 25, 2005 10:01:57 PM
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
钢托盘
木托盘
钢制托盘
托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
杭州托盘
成都托盘
武汉托盘
长沙托盘
合肥托盘
苏州托盘
无锡托盘
昆山托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
南京钢制托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
木托盘
塑料托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
Posted by: peter.w | Sep 15, 2007 7:25:52 AM



