« Yawn | Main | Nice Try, But... »

April 22, 2005

Bolting on Bolton

Maybe I'm overestimating the power of Powell, but I have to think his decision to actively lobby against Bolton effectively kills the nomination. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee is notable for its motley collection of Republican moderates -- guess the rest of the caucus wanted to cut taxes or something? -- and they're exactly the folks who listen to the words of Colin, he's one of their own. So now that he's having chit-chats with Chafee and Hagel, and Chafee and Hagel have been wobbling ever since Voinovich forced Lugar to blink, it seems like this little push from someone with so much popular authority should be more than enough to convince one or both of 'em that Bolton shouldn't exit the committee alive. And if Bolton can't get out of committee, and Social Security privatization can't pass, it's really looking like lame duckhood for this president.

That reminds me: Is anyone else thinking Bush term two looks a lot like Clinton term one? Tough fights on nominations, unpopular cultural battles (gays in the military then, Schiavo now), collapse of primary domestic initiatives (Health Care reform then, privatization now), ethical investigations weakening friendly congressional leaders, and so on. The resemblance is quite close.

April 22, 2005 in Republicans | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/19450/2315017

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bolting on Bolton:

Comments

I certainly hope you're right. Certainly Powell entering the game like this is bad news for Bolton.

I like this from Noam Scheiber's latest thoughts on how much of a wuss Chafee is:

"Now that Voinovich has given him cover, all of a sudden Chafee has turned into Peter Falk."

Heh. The committee should call some female witnesses just so Chafee could say, "Scuse me, ma'am..."

Posted by: Haggai | Apr 22, 2005 1:06:12 PM

The difference between Clinton 1.0 and Bush II 2.0 is that Clinton was blocked trying to do good things and Bush is being blocked trying to do very bad things.

Posted by: J Bean | Apr 22, 2005 1:17:11 PM

It does have a lot of uncanny similarities to the first Clinton term. But that's largely because political failure manifests itself in the same way regardless of time, more or less.

There are two main differences. First, Bush hasn't spent huge amounts of political capital on any legislative wins that ended up hurting him (we can argue about whether or not NAFTA was good policy, but it's pretty cleary terrible politics). Second, the conservative crackup is not as far along as the Democratic crackup was. Clinton tried to allow gays-in-the-military almost right out of the gate, and Democrats who endorsed him abandoned him. Conservative Democrats like Boren (D-OK) gave him no love on the Deficit Reduction act.

So, history doesn't repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme.

Posted by: Electoral Math | Apr 22, 2005 1:53:49 PM

Its not over till its over....

The Bush/Rove/Delay/Frist 'magic' hasn't been fully applied yet to those wavering Repub. Senators. Recall this is an administration that approves of and uses torture for enemy combatants.

Somehow I doubt if Chafee, Hagel, and Voinovitch are up to much fingernail-pulling, waterboarding, testicle-shocking, and the current-day political equivalents.

Of course I'd like a lame-duckish Bush, but I don't think we are close yet. Bankruptcy, Estate Taxes, Energy, Rice, Negroponte, Gonzales, More tax cuts for the wealthy, etc. are not exactly setbacks.

Posted by: JimPortlandOR | Apr 22, 2005 1:58:40 PM

9/11 changed everything... but not forever, thank god!
Right now, the domestic politics in this country are about where they would have been in 2002 had 9/11 occurred. Bush is an artless politician, except that he's very good at being relentlessly aggresive; however, as Texas Ranger fans found out in the early 90s, Bush undervalues defense.
9/11 put Bush's opponents on the defensive, and it's taken 4 years for them to get their legs back. Now that the Democrats are able to hit back at Bush, you can expect Bush to flounder more and more. He simply can't play hardball on a level field.

Posted by: marky | Apr 23, 2005 12:47:38 AM

托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
钢托盘
木托盘
钢制托盘
托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
杭州托盘
成都托盘
武汉托盘
长沙托盘
合肥托盘
苏州托盘
无锡托盘
昆山托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
南京钢制托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘

托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
木托盘
塑料托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘

托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘


托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
托盘
塑料托盘

Posted by: peter.w | Sep 15, 2007 7:33:09 AM

Post a comment