March 14, 2005
u hav no privacy OMG lolz!!1!
Just when I think I'm out, they pull me back in!
Ezra has graciously asked me to mind the shop today, and I've gladly obliged. (I guess this is what it's like to be an Army reservist.) Anyway, I want to direct your collective attention to a startling development on the privacy front. Apparently, AIM is Big Brother:
America Online, Inc. has quietly updated the terms of service for its AIM instant messaging application, making several changes that is sure [sic] to raise the hackles of Internet privacy advocates.
The revamped terms of service, which apply only to users who downloaded the free AIM software on or after Feb. 5, 2004, gives AOL the right to "reproduce, display, perform, distribute, adapt and promote" all content distributed across the chat network by users.
I can't remember the last time I wrote something on AIM that could be "performed." Still, it's a vaguely alarming trend. It doesn't seem that bad at first, but consider this: Personally, I communicate with friends, especially faraway ones, with AIM way more than I do on the phone. If the phone company had claimed the right to reproduce, redistribute, or godforbid perform recorded phone conversations, people would go nuts. But when it happens on AIM, which is arguably used more frequently than the phone, people are more or less complacent. Why?
I think it has a lot to do with the Internet being seen as a giant, shared thing. I remember posting a link to my friend's livejournal once, only to have her yell at me for making her innermost thoughts public knowledge. I was baffled. You posted them on the Internet!, I thought to myself. With the advent of blogs, which rely crucially on the idea that communications are non-secretive, this idea has only been reinforced. But in a way, my friend was right. Increasingly, people are turning to the Internet for purposes that are decidedly personal. AIM is just one example. VoIP, a weird (and apparently government-regulated) merger of phone and internet, is another.
The 'net is attractive to companies, because it makes it easy to gather massive amounts of data in what is essentially a public forum. But what happens when people try to carve off small chunks of it for personal use? In other words: Is AIM stepping over the line in trying to copyright your private communications? Or are you stepping over the line by claiming some expectation of privacy within a "publicly available worldwide system of interconnected computer networks"?
Can't wait to see what Lessig thinks of this one. Incidentally, my AIM name is WordOMatic. (Grade school nickname that stuck.) Drop me a line sometime. Just don't tell me anything you wouldn't tell AOL.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference u hav no privacy OMG lolz!!1!:
I look forward to the first time AOL attempts to use copyrighted material being transmitted between employees of the company that holds the copyright. I predict their TOS comes out the loser in that fight.
Posted by: Singularity | Mar 14, 2005 4:06:44 AM
My opinion is that this may be an attempt to create a legal bludgeon to use against multi-IM clients like Trillian.
Posted by: Sandals | Mar 14, 2005 6:16:34 AM
I remember the CB craze of the Seventies. "The Public" all went out and bought radios and my dad used to stay up late at night listening to the traffic on the Upperside band where with atmospheric skip you're range was akin to shortwave. All you needed was a glossary of radio slang or the ability to suss it out on your own.
The difference is that Citizen's Band was owned by the citizens. There was no disputing who owned radio waves. Now, everwhere I look there is a legal disclaimer, a writ, a license agreement. And all of it to own electronic zeros and ones.
Posted by: obelus | Mar 14, 2005 7:42:55 AM
"AIM, which is arguably used more frequently than the phone..."
By you, perhaps.
But seriously? No.
Not used more often than the phone.
This is just not true.
Posted by: jkd | Mar 14, 2005 10:11:06 AM
You can't imagine chats being performed?
Behold, JerkCity in all its, ahem, glory.
Posted by: Stoffel | Mar 14, 2005 5:56:24 PM
AOL just got sluffed off a free trial at my place. Not at any price, even if I'm being silly. Not too nuts about Microsoft selling out integrity on file software that you pay out good money to get, either.
Posted by: opit | Mar 14, 2005 6:21:57 PM
Orange County Superior court Judge Francisco P. Briseno said the accusers right to privacy outweighed the need to reveal the evidence in open court.do girls masturbate exposicion oralanal sex adult halloween manchester bisexuals foto sexy orgy girlsanal fisting galleries boobs tits pantie blog copulating horny drunk high school cheerleader free gangbang gallery ilegal porn sites
Posted by: taboo | Nov 11, 2005 7:25:25 PM
Aujourdhui, jannonce un nouvel effort en vue de mieux répandre cette méthode dans le continent africain. Je demande au Congrès daffecter 55 millions de dollars sur une période de trois ans afin de promouvoir la justice et lémancipation des femmes dans quatre pays africains, qui pourront servir dexemple à dautres. Jexhorte les autres États membres du G8 à se joindre à nous pour protéger la vie et les droits des femmes en Afrique.erotik piesvideo fuckmale softcore guide to anal sex hollywood lingerie hot shaved pussy ebony nude japanese girlsxxx video free legserotic spanking stories scat piss hentai sailor moon nifty erotic story archive
Posted by: stories | Nov 13, 2005 3:07:55 AM
employment bay 20atower westchester business council 7th heaven charity to help you restorative aide in a nursing home pbs barni painting voluntory action center eugene oregon second spin national home furniture
Posted by: Papayem | Jun 27, 2007 10:14:25 PM
outdoor playarea footing feree trailers c murder second degree murder conviction over turned by louisiana supreme court cheap internet bossy lyrics scenary design micro breweries in michigan city hope center dilboy stadium pictures nasarel
Posted by: Papayru | Jun 27, 2007 10:14:27 PM
Posted by: peter.w | Sep 15, 2007 5:21:33 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.