« Election Day | Main | Wild for Guy »
March 08, 2005
The Answer
I think Matt (Singer) gives Joe Klein and the Moose too much credit on this one. The answer to a radical right challenge is to fucking crush it. Seriously. I try to be reasonable and even-tempered here, but this is an ideological invasion. The way to repel it is not to run some mushy centrist campaign with vouchers and "personal accounts" and empiricism, it's to detonate the extremist philosophy underpinning the fools. Look -- I'm a moderate. I probably agree with Joe Klein on lots of things. I'm a big fan of growth and market forces and lots of other stuff that regularly shows up in DLC dispatches. But you know what? Americans don't want to hear about our plans for better management of electrical grids or more equitable distribution of Medicaid spending. They want us to do those things, but they're going to vote us in or out based on our strength, our conviction, and our self-confidence. Which means they're going to vote us in when we speak like this again:
The thing that makes me angriest about what has gone wrong in the last 12 years is that our government has lost touch with our values, while our politicians continue to shout about them. I’m tired of it! (Applause)
I was raised to believe the American Dream was built on rewarding hard work. But we have seen the folks of Washington turn the American ethic on its head.
For too long those who play by the rules and keep the faith have gotten the shaft, and those who cut corners and cut deals have been rewarded. (Applause)
People are working harder than ever, spending less time with their children, working nights and weekends at their jobs instead of going to PTA and Little League or Scouts. And their incomes are still going down. (Applause) Their taxes are still going up. And the costs of health care, housing and education are going through the roof. (Applause)
Meanwhile, more and more of our best people are falling into poverty even though they work 40 hours a week. (Applause)
Our people are pleading for change, but government is in the way. It has been hijacked by privileged private interests. It has forgotten who really pays the bills around here. (Applause) It has taken more of your money and given you less in return. We have got to go beyond the brain-dead politics in Washington and give our people the kind of government they deserve, a government that works for them. (Applause)
That was Clinton accepting the Democratic nomination for president, and doing it with conviction. That was him exposing Bush's father as an out-of-touch technocrat, and we'll win when we do the same to his son's successor. I was there, in 2004, when Kerry stood on the stage and assumed the mantle of standard-bearer. And I listened to his proud and stirring defense of Democratic ideals. But it was just that -- a defense. We ran a defensive convention and they ran an offensive (in more ways than one) convention. That allowed them to challenge our nominee and philosophy while theirs emerged untouched. We can't do that again. So no, Joe Klein, the response to a radical right challenge isn't some pablum about changing economies and the vital center, it's an overwhelming counteroffensive. It's an exposition of everything that's morally bankrupt, spiritually unsound, and empirically unstable in their ideology. And it has nothing to do with industrial societies. Your boy, our boy, Clinton, knew that. And so his position as a New Democrat never interrupted his attacks on old Republicans. See that his second-term strategy of triangulation, a strategy that was mandated by his weaknesses and had the long term effect of weakening the party, does not obscure your vision of his entirely successful strategy for toppling an incumbent by exposing his ideological deficiencies.
March 8, 2005 in Strategy | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c572d53ef00d83421c38353ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Answer:
» “...government they deserve, a government that works for them.” from E Pluribus Unum
Democrats will not win a national election by running to the center, by becoming more attuned to this state's constituency or that state's cultural sensitivies. That's what you do when you play defense. Democrats will win national elections again when... [Read More]
Tracked on Mar 8, 2005 2:25:01 PM
» Bredesen, the Bankruptcy Bill, and the Failure of the DLC from Lean Left
South Knox Bubba points us to emails from Bredesen's staff that pretty much prove that Bredesen never had intention of trying to repair TennCare and was only looking to kill it:
According to the article, an e-mail from Finance Director Dave Goetz sai... [Read More]
Tracked on Mar 8, 2005 9:21:13 PM
» Challenge vs Pablum from CommonSenseDesk
Ezra recommends that the Dems take a much stronger approach in their response to the radical right. [Read More]
Tracked on Mar 8, 2005 10:08:19 PM
Comments
I agree, of course, but while the only way to challenge the right-wing is to "crush" it, we don't have the opportunity until 2006 to do anything but counterpunch on Social Security, bankruptcy bill, Iraq, etc... We *can't* set an agenda as much as we want to, but we do have an important role in a) providijng an intellectual framework for the 08' Presidential candidate and the next Dem. administration, and b) choosing where to counterpunch (SS is an obvious one, as is the religious right's hubris).
For all the talk of DNC v. Dean, the next two years are ideal for us in this sense: the one thing that will bind our 48% which includes cons. Dems is pointing out when the GOP completely oversteps. Once the 2008 nomination fight begins, we'll go back to our quadrennial foodfight (luckily, so will the Republicans).
I do have to disagree in one sense. Was Clinton affirmatively stating an agenda in 1992 during the campaign? Yep. But, consider this: even in his first two years with the Presidency and majorities in both houses of Congress, when he had an opportunity to set the debate and cause a paradigm shift concerning the role of government, he ultimately failed.
There was an opportunity lost. There is no Clinton legacy today, no overarching vision to guide us once we have lost. All we have from Clinton are tactical lessons that do us no good when we are in opposition (people will say "a good economy", but, while important, memories of the 90s economy didn't provide a boost to Kerry -- or provide a leg to stand on for Dems. in Congress).
Posted by: Chris Rasmussen | Mar 8, 2005 1:52:12 PM
Ezra, you're on a roll. Nothing to add here. Does anyone know where there's a copy of Alben Barkley's 1948 convention speech? Apparently he got the VP nomination on the basis of a rip-roaring anti-Republican tirade that caused mass swooning among Democrats. Then the next night Hubert Humphrey split the party. Or at least that's how I think it went. I can't find the speech on the internet.
Posted by: Marshall | Mar 8, 2005 1:53:45 PM
nice post, Ezra.
Posted by: praktike | Mar 8, 2005 3:22:14 PM
Being a conservative economically, I still agree with Ezra. I also think we need to garner moderate republican support by showing how neo-conservative ideals are outside their parties traditional value structure. Basically, while showing your guns, you have to also mobilize as many dissatisfied voters as possible. Don't waiver or cater. Simply show how democratic values cross party lines.
Posted by: Michael Schreiber | Mar 8, 2005 3:34:30 PM
I think what we are all trying to say is the Democratic Party needs to take steroids: to be more aggressive, to be stronger, and to increase that stamina (without the shriveled balls or man boobs).
Right?
Posted by: Steve C | Mar 8, 2005 4:13:40 PM
Bravo. I wish more moderates would understand that the battle right now isn't one of policy, it's politics. The zeitgeist, and political conditions, demand that we fight with conviction. We didn't choose this particular battlefield, and it's not naturally in our temperament to do politics this way, but it is the reality of the times.
And I would suggest that the Republicans are either overwhelmed with hubris or they are being consciously provocative. Picking John Bolton for the UN is an example of them putting the boot to our throats and saying "waddaya gonna do about it, punk?" They didn't have to do it any more than they have to pick the most controversial right wing judges. There is no longer any illusion on their part that accomodation or even dignity to our side is required. That's quite a big assumption for a party that holds a bare 51% majority.
Many of us are slow to lose our tempers but when we are pushed too far we will fight like hell. That's where we are.
Posted by: digby | Mar 8, 2005 4:37:48 PM
"And I would suggest that the Republicans are either overwhelmed with hubris or they are being consciously provocative. Picking John Bolton for the UN is an example of them putting the boot to our throats and saying "waddaya gonna do about it, punk?"'
You're gonna have to stop anticipating the posts I;m writing. It's getting so your comments are like teaser trailers for tomorrow's posts.
Posted by: Ezra | Mar 8, 2005 4:41:28 PM
I agree totally, Ezra--if anything, you're too easy on Klein. There's a flipside to all the squishy, Clintonian, split-the-difference triangulation that he's flogging: to wit, the marginalizing or "purging" of the progressive base (what he calls the "reactionary left").
It's bad enough to base your approach on "We're just like the other guys, only somewhat less so." It's even worse when it gets to the point of "Now there are good liberals and bad liberals, and we're the good kind...pay no attention to those bad liberals over there, we don't like them either."
Posted by: Uncle Kvetch | Mar 8, 2005 5:45:47 PM
ezra,
i think that you could not be more right about this. as i tried to imply down below this weekend, even the very language that klein uses is interesting, isn't it? the "radical right" and the "reactionary left." it shows how massively the right-wing in this country has managed not just to win the frame war, but cause a whole-sale paradigm shift.
and as you suggest, the only way to beat 'em is to fucking kick the shit out of them (metaphorically).
Posted by: michael | Mar 8, 2005 8:00:11 PM
I heard Joe Klein was Ezra's Dad.
Posted by: praktike | Mar 8, 2005 8:10:53 PM
If that's true, I have a feeling I'm about to get grounded...
Posted by: Ezra | Mar 8, 2005 8:47:51 PM
I don't understand how Clinton (NAFTA, Welfare "reform", don't ask-don't tell) understood anything but bending over for the dominant party. As for his second term being mandated by his weaknesses, well said.
Posted by: eRobin | Mar 9, 2005 8:38:20 AM
The Republicans are passionate about their cause, the Democrats are not. The Democrats are passionate about hating Republicans, for sure.....but I'd bet on the side that believes in itself, its core ideals(right or wrong, of course). I don't really think the Democrats have shown that elan of self-esteem.....why? Maybe it is better to adopt a more centrist dogma--that's where 80% of the population lives and acts out their decisions and is comfortable.
Posted by: Steve Mudge | Mar 9, 2005 11:29:08 PM
"The answer to a radical right challenge is to fucking crush it."
Gosh...I really got a charge out of just reading a sentence like that...Let's hope the leadership realizes how important that is...
Posted by: Ganymede | Mar 11, 2005 3:06:37 AM
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
sh.SEXMOVIES
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
Posted by: JEROGatch | Sep 3, 2006 3:16:05 AM 托盘 托盘 托盘 托盘 托盘 托盘 托盘 托盘 托盘 托盘 托盘 托盘 托盘 托盘 托盘 Posted by: peter.w | Sep 15, 2007 5:36:50 AM The comments to this entry are closed.
VIDEOSBLOG
VIDEOSBLOG
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
钢托盘
木托盘
钢制托盘
托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
南京托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
杭州托盘
成都托盘
武汉托盘
长沙托盘
合肥托盘
苏州托盘
无锡托盘
昆山托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
南京托盘
南京钢制托盘
南京钢托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
托盘
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
铁托盘
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
木托盘
塑料托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
木制托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
铁托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
纸托盘
木塑托盘
柱式托盘
波纹板托盘
镀锌托盘
南京托盘
上海托盘
北京托盘
广州托盘



